Title: Bayes DB version issue 3.1.3 => 3.1.4
Hello,
I can’t remember smoking crack when copying the config files over but anything’s possible.
I built out a new machine today and installed SA. We have a list of CPAN modules that were installed (same list as from the 3.1.3 servers). I c
On 8/8/2006 3:29 AM, Gary W. Smith wrote:
Hello,
I can’t remember smoking crack when copying the config files over but
anything’s possible.
I built out a new machine today and installed SA. We have a list of
CPAN modules that were installed (same list as from the 3.1.3 servers).
I copied
Received in my .mac (basically a spam bin) account.http://www.triksys.be/docspam.jpg = screenshot of word doc attached.Neer seen this beforeIs this new, or old news?211.16.219.135 is in all kinds of blacklists though.Patrick SneyersBelgiumVan: Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Datum: 8 august
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
I only wanted to add a small note: I recently saw gifs that cannot be
converted using imagemagick because they are either sloppy generated
or with intention partly corrupted. Please think about using giftopnm
and jpegtopnm instead. If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
as I recently mentioned in the FuzzyOcr Thread, I found quite a lot
mails that contain broken or corrupted gifs.
I found one type that lets convert calculate extremely long and then
fails, but with giftopnm it works after it spits out s
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Hamish wrote:
> Yeah, Right... And Verisign never wildcarded domains either did they? Duh!
> right back at you.
>
> > RFC 1123 section 2.1:
> >
> > The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
>
> Hostname vs DomainName
The domain name system itself do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all. Mostly a lurker here. I am trying to install the imageinfo
plugin. So, i followed the instructions, place *.pm file in "Plugins"
dir and *.cf file in "Spamassassin" dir. Do a spamassassin --lint and get
[6870] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I keep getting the following from spamassasin (Running under amavisd
debug-sa). Any ideas what I've done wrong this time?
The database is mysql. SpamAssassin is 3.1.4 (It also did the same
with 3.1.3).
[12172] dbg: bayes: database connection establi
decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains fuzzy
matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
intentional obfuscations in the text don't
I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was possible
to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked that all
tables are the same type? MyISAM or Inno? If they are all the same,
I'd be inclined to pull it down, rebuild from the SA supplied SQL and
retrain.
Did you merge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
> possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
> that all tables are the same type? MyISAM or Inno? If they are all
> the same, I'd be inclined
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Keller wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
>> fuzzy matching. Like
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:02:04 +0100, Hamish Marson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
>> possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
>> that all t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
> possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
> that all tables are the same type? MyISAM or Inno? If they are all
> the same, I'd be inclined
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:08:52 +0100, Hamish Marson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
>> possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
>> that all t
--On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:27 AM +0200 Patrick Sneyers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Received in my .mac (basically a spam bin) account.
http://www.triksys.be/docspam.jpg = screenshot of word doc attached.
Neer seen this before
Is this new, or old news?
211.16.219.135 is in all kinds of
* Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was surprised to see one of these as well.
>
> I'd always thought that it would be nice for the Open Office people to
> create a simple command-line utility to convert Word files to plain text
> for spam checking.
man antiword
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.
--On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:51 AM +0200 decoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
as I recently mentioned in the FuzzyOcr Thread, I found quite a lot
mails that contain broken or corrupted gifs.
Until we have a better answer, I'd reject anything with an unrecognizable
format. It might be an at
Perhaps corrupted gifs should be treated as spam?
decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
I only wanted to add a small note: I recently saw gifs that cannot be
converted using imagemagick because they are either sloppy generated
or with intention partly
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> I only wanted to add a small note: I recently saw gifs that cannot be
> converted using imagemagick because they are either sloppy generated
> or with intention partly corrupted. Please think about using giftopnm
> and jpegtopnm instead. If you have a better id
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
> Then comment-out the loadplugin line in the .cf file and you're fine.
Generally speaking, don't put loadplugin lines in your cf files. (if people
are looking at the sandbox cf and saying "but you do that", yes, for
development. ;)
On Tue, August 8, 2006 12:33, Matthias Keller wrote:
>
> # ImageInfo - performs some checks over the attached images
> #
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm
>
> Then comment-out the loadplugin line in the .cf file and you're fine.
make i
On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
> In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
> lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
> both machines exceedingly fast now.
> No idea what could have possibly changed, dnscache is no
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
both machines exceedingly fast now.
No idea what could have possibly changed, d
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, August 8, 2006 12:33, Matthias Keller wrote:
# ImageInfo - performs some checks over the attached images
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo
/etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm
Then comment-out the loadplugin line in the .cf file and you'r
This is because your database is in UTF8 format. As a result SA cannot
read it (though it can write it).
Drop the database and recreate it and the tables in latin and it will
work just fine. You will have to retrain after that though.
-Original Message-
From: Hamish Marson [mailto:[EMAI
On Saturday, August 5, 2006, 12:46:20 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> spamcop.com is the windows client for spamcop.net ?
No, IIRC it's something totally different that's squatting a
similar domain name, probably on purpose.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
On Thursday, August 3, 2006, 7:40:57 AM, Andrzej Filip wrote:
> Make *clear* distiction between thre basic ways of using spmacop.net
Correct: spamcop.net has multiple functions.
> 1) email blocking at MTA level [may be controversial cause of "zero+
> tolerance"]
Not recommended. Too many FPs
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
both machines exceedingly fast now.
No idea what could have possibly changed, d
Daryl,
Thanks for the info. I will update the .8. As for the database, which
is the primary concern, the user account is correct. I have logged into
the database from that server using the same credentials from the
local.cf file. I had thought that we might have restricted by subnet so
I did
On Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 2:01:44 PM, Michele Blacknight.ie wrote:
> Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > Hold on there Bullwinkle! I have been religiously using spamcop in the
>> hopes that the reports that are sent out get used by at least some of the
>> ISPs. Am I wrong about this?
>>
> We're an ISP
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 7:53:45 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
>>> In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
>>> lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
>>> both
Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
stock spams that are multiple, vertical images?
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:05:04 AM, DAve DAve wrote:
> I had no logging running on dnscache before so I don't *know* what was
> happening. I re-enabled logging and the issue went away. To be specific
> I changed my run file from
> exec setuidgid Gdnslog multilog -*
> to
> exec setuidgid Gdnslo
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 7:53:45 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Unlikely to be a dnscache issue. I run over 10 SA servers, all with
local djb dnscaches.
Aha, but do you use Linux or FreeBSD?
I can't remember the details but I remember a FreeBSD/SA issue
recently.
Hi,
Both
All,
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
> techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
> stock spams that are multiple, vertical images?
Any technique for single image stock spams would be welcomed t
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:05:04 AM, DAve DAve wrote:
I had no logging running on dnscache before so I don't *know* what was
happening. I re-enabled logging and the issue went away. To be specific
I changed my run file from
exec setuidgid Gdnslog multilog -*
to
exec setuid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
>> techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
>> stock spams that are multiple, vertical im
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 08:22 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
> > techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
> > stock spams that are multiple, vertical images?
>
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:26:18 AM, decoder decoder wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>>> Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
>>> techniques are folks having good lu
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
stock spams that are multiple, vertical images?
Any technique for single image stock sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:26:18 AM, decoder decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
>> Jeff Chan wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Aside from the experimental OCR s
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
Because so many people try to forge messages from eBay but what
comes from their own servers is almost definitely not spam,
eBay seems like
DAve wrote:
[snip]
If it happens again I'll have some logs, provided I catch it in time,
dnscache makes logs like bunnies make more bunnies.
Until then I'm inclined to think it was a resource issue or anomaly on
my system rather than an issue with SA or dnscache. I run dnscache on
all my we
RE: Looking for a good Ebay whitelist
The following are what I have deemed as frequently used official e-bay smtp
servers. This list might be used for whitelisting or/and negative scoring:
66.135.195.180-181
66.135.195.254
66.135.197.7-29
66.135.197.164
66.135.207.155
66.135.209.198-221
66.135.21
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
DAve wrote:
[snip]
If it happens again I'll have some logs, provided I catch it in time,
dnscache makes logs like bunnies make more bunnies.
Until then I'm inclined to think it was a resource issue or anomaly on
my system rather than an issue with SA or dnscache. I run d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
Theo Van Dinter wrote, On 8/8/06 7:04 AM:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
>> Then comment-out the loadplugin line in the .cf file and you're fine.
>
> Generally speaking, don't put loadplugin lines in your c
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rob McEwen wrote:
The following are what I have deemed as frequently used official e-bay smtp
servers. This list might be used for whitelisting or/and negative scoring:
66.135.195.180-181
66.135.195.254
66.135.197.7-29
66.135.197.164
66.135.207.155
66.135.209.198-221
66.135.2
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, DAve wrote:
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Dave, you might need to update the 'root/servers/@' file. IIRC, a couple of
root servers have changed in the past few years.
We replace the @ file with one of our own on every server. I contains just
our dns servers and our own caches.
Sil
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, DAve wrote:
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Dave, you might need to update the 'root/servers/@' file. IIRC, a
couple of root servers have changed in the past few years.
We replace the @ file with one of our own on every server. I contains
just our dns servers and ou
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rob McEwen wrote:
> > The following are what I have deemed as frequently used official e-bay
> > smtp servers. This list might be used for whitelisting or/and negative
> > scoring:
Seems like ebay is signing messages with DomainKeys, I'm getting
DK_VERIFIED in my log for mail
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 01:51, decoder wrote:
> But I can view it perfectly. Does anyone know what this could be
> caused by and a tool which can reliably convert these to pnm?
>
> Another question that I would have in mind is, if that was intended to
> happen...
>
> Best regards
>
> Chris
Are
Heute (08.08.2006/18:52 Uhr) schrieb Mark Martinec,
>> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rob McEwen wrote:
>> > The following are what I have deemed as frequently used official e-bay
>> > smtp servers. This list might be used for whitelisting or/and negative
>> > scoring:
> Seems like ebay is signing messages
I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today. If anyone
is interested it's here.
http://pixelhammer.com/local-cf.txt
DAve
--
Three years now I've
> I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
> rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
>
> I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today.
> If anyone
> is interested it's here.
>
> http://pixelhammer.com/local-cf.txt
Actually, I can unde
DAve wrote:
> I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
> rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
>
> I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today. If
> anyone is interested it's here.
>
> http://pixelhammer.com/local-cf.txt
updates_
Just thought ya'll would be interested to know that I just spent about 45
minutes trying to convince an I.T. guy at one of the largest regional banks in
my area that a spam filter should ONLY check the IP address of the sending mail
server against RBLs, NOT every single IP contained within the h
At 09:52 08-08-2006, Mark Martinec wrote:
Seems like ebay is signing messages with DomainKeys, I'm getting
DK_VERIFIED in my log for mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and similar.
Ebay.com and a few other high profile domains have been signing their
mail with DK. Note that the
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
I noticed that if I have updates_spamassassin_org.cf in place in my
rules dir, my local.cf rule changes are set back to default.
I tried to post, but that soesn't seem to be an option today. If
anyone is interested it's here.
http://pixelhammer.com/local-cf.txt
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:48:49PM -0400, DAve wrote:
> Yep, I suspected as much. Now I have SA in three places, four if you
> count plugins.
More if you count the modules and the commandline tools.
> I just had the crazy idea that I could keep rules in one place. Is this
> beginning to look un
> > Yep, I suspected as much. Now I have SA in three places,
> four if you
> > count plugins.
>
> More if you count the modules and the commandline tools.
>
> > I just had the crazy idea that I could keep rules in one
> place. Is this
> > beginning to look unwieldy to anyone else? (rhetorical,
> do
Hello,
I was kind of shocked when I discovered that there is no SpamAssassin manual
or tutorial. For me, it's unimaginable that the world's leading open source
spam detection software is missing such an important piece of documentation.
The wiki pages are more bits and pieces than a coherent d
Hello,
I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails with mails
which contain some explaination and the original mail as an attachment. The
attachment of the mail you're just reading contains such a mail produced by
Courier MTA.
Do those modifications done by Courier MTA c
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails with mails
> which contain some explaination and the original mail as an attachment. The
> attachment of the mail you're just reading contains such a mail produced by
> Courier MTA.
>
> Do tho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional obfuscations in the t
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 22:51 schrieb Michael Scheidell:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails with
> > mails which contain some explaination and the original mail as an
> > attachment. The attachment of the mail you're j
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails
> with mails which contain some explaination and the original mail as
> an attachment. The attachment of the mail you're just reading
> contains such a mail produced by Courier MTA.
>
> Do thos
decoder wrote:
> decoder wrote:
> >> Hello there,
> >>
> >> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> >> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> >> intentional obfuscations in the text don't ma
SARE maintains a whitelist. I don't know if those particular sites are on
it or not. If you can provide the appropriate info for a
whitelist_from_recvd line they could probably be added.
Loren
Okay, I have a little more information now. I run the same command that
sql.pm would run. It appears to be a collation issue. Can we force the
collation with 3.1.4 to a specific type? In my case the database is in
latin because 3.1.3 choked on UTF8. This was on RHEL4 (which defaults
to UTF8).
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 23:04 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails
> > with mails which contain some explaination and the original mail as
> > an attachment. The attachment of the mail you're just r
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Bret Miller wrote:
I'm not exactly sure
what the thinking was in moving the updates to /var/lib instead of
keeping them with /usr/share with the original rules. I wonder why
sa-update doesn't just create a version folder under /share/spamassassin
and use that...
Because it's
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I was kind of shocked when I discovered that there is no SpamAssassin manual
or tutorial. For me, it's unimaginable that the world's leading open source
spam detection software is missing such an important piece of documentation.
Well, it's not entir
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
Because so many people try to forge messages from eBay but what
comes from their own servers is alm
man spamassassin is the key to the whole thing beyond the INSTALL files.
Then you have things like "man Mail::SpamAssassin" and its kith and kin
like "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf". These will generally be more up to
date than any documentation file that exists. And of course the original
man spa
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, John Andersen wrote:
>
> Are you sure its perfect? I've seem many of these where
> they are intentionally corrupting the last portion (bottom edge)
> of the image so as to avoid simple size or hashing techniques.
>
> The ones I saw were the same image visually, but the botto
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was surprised to see one of these as well.
I'd always thought that it would be nice for the Open Office people to
create a simple command-line utility to convert Word files to plain text
for spam checking.
> From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >* Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> I was surprised to see one of these as well.
> >>
> >> I'd always thought that it would be nice for the Open
> Office people to
> >> create a simple command-line utility to convert Word files
> to pla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, John Andersen wrote:
>> Are you sure its perfect? I've seem many of these where they are
>> intentionally corrupting the last portion (bottom edge) of the
>> image so as to avoid simple size or hashing tech
This is interesting.
This is a list of relays with the From field matching '@ebay.'
202.64.65.129.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer gabriel.its.calpoly.edu.
204.64.65.129.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
email-gateway-michael.its.calpoly.edu.
10.193.98.140.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer ruebert
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
So it seems like SPF is probably something good to rely on
in t
Hello,
I was kind of shocked when I discovered that there is no SpamAssassin
manual
or tutorial. For me, it's unimaginable that the world's leading open
source
spam detection software is missing such an important piece of
documentation.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc.html
There are a l
Bret Miller wrote:
Yep, I suspected as much. Now I have SA in three places,
four if you
count plugins.
More if you count the modules and the commandline tools.
I just had the crazy idea that I could keep rules in one
place. Is this
beginning to look unwieldy to anyone else? (rhetorical,
d
| From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| ...
|
| > --Chris
| >
| > (If I spelt everything correct.I'm sorry.)
| ^What's this spelt stuff? It sounds nasty.
It's what's left over from making beer - I've seen it used to make bread.
Bret Miller wrote:
Yep, I suspected as much. Now I have SA in three places,
four if you
count plugins.
More if you count the modules and the commandline tools.
I just had the crazy idea that I could keep rules in one
place. Is this
beginning to look unwieldy to anyone else? (rhetorical,
d
> From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > man antiword
>
> No manual entry for antiword
Looks really useful and straightforward, thanks Ralf!
In the FreeBSD ports collection it comes under: textproc/antiword
or fetch it from its home site: http://www.winfield.demon.nl/
Mark
I've created a new database in UTF8 format. I will see how this works
out. I might try to copy the data from the Latin database to the UTF8
database but in past experience this hasn't worked that great. I might
also make a backup as well and try that.
-Original Message-
From: Gary W.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> John D. Hardin wrote:
> >
> > Adding a point for corrupted images is sounding better and better.
>
> Definetly a good idea... I will try to add this feature in the next
> release of FuzzyOcr (v.2.1) then.
I'd suggest a better place would be the imageinfo plug
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
So it seems like SPF i
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 1:01 AM +0200 Mark Martinec
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the FreeBSD ports collection it comes under: textproc/antiword
or fetch it from its home site: http://www.winfield.demon.nl/
Cool. What's involved in integrating this into SA? Can the image plugin
machi
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:18 AM +0200 decoder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am also thinking about scanning all attachments, no matter if the
content type specifies image or not (in the current version 2.0, only
attachments that have image in their content type are scanned with
format a
jdow wrote:
If SPF is good and says from ebay subtract some points in a
meta rule. That gets you going while any whitelist that uses
spf gets built.
(Either that or "do it yourself." {^_-})
You might as well "do it yourself", since a single "whitelist_from_spf"
seems a lot simpler (and faste
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 23:54 schrieb Logan Shaw:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> [...]
> > Second, I often have a message of the following form in my mail log:
> >
> > courierlocal: [...] Cannot open bayes databases
> > /home/wolfgang/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock fa
Nigel,
I ended up taking the approach you listed a little earlier. The problem
is that I now have two separate bayes databases; one for RH/3.1.3 and
one for rPath/3.1.4.
This isn't that much of a resource problem rather a redundancy problem
(as I replicate the databases to our DR location, etc)
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Bret Miller wrote:
Yep, I suspected as much. Now I have SA in three places,
four if you
count plugins.
More if you count the modules and the commandline tools.
I just had the crazy idea that I could keep rules in one
place. Is this
beginning to look unwieldy to an
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, James Lay wrote:
>
> > Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
> > have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus
> > the SARE rules tank it? Or
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Hey all!
> >
> > Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
> > have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus
> > the SARE rules tank it?
James Lay wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, James Lay wrote:
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1
FOLLOW-UP:
This bank is using GFI for spam filtering:
http://www.gfi.com/
And looking at GFI's manual, it seems that GFI treats ALL IPs in the header
the same and any one blacklisted is treated just the same as if the sending
mail server's IP were blacklisted... with NO option to **only** check
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
