Thanks Jeff, much better now :-)
That's a great site, will definitely be having a look around there for
other useful resources.
Thanks again,
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Jones, Chris L: IT (LDN)
Sent: 12 June 2006 10:53
To: 'Jeff Chan'
Subject: RE: Low scoring since 3.1.1 upgrade
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:23:35PM -0600, wrote:
I would defer to the smart people to figure out the details. However I do
wonder if the actual body content of the message would be best stored in a
file and the SQL used to store anything and everything you would want to
On Montag, 12. Juni 2006 10:03 Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2006, at 07:53, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > yesterday I've got some new kind of spam:
> >
> > X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Received: from abruxateatro.com (unknown [210.245.161.31])
> > by power2u.goelsen.net (
Title: RE: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network Device server
> -Original Message-
> From: Brent Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:02 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network
Does SpamAssassin have it's own whitelist / blacklist
if yes where is it located?
when is the configuration file to enable this feature?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-SpamAssassin-t1781206.html#a4849823
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.
On Tue, June 13, 2006 10:21 am, slyandjen said:
>
> Does SpamAssassin have it's own whitelist / blacklist
Of course.
>
> if yes where is it located?
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
or
/home/$USER/.spamassassin/user_prefs
>
> when is the configuration file to enable this feature?
Anything you
At 22:57 12-06-2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Already changed in 3.2:
describe DK_SIGNED Domain Keys: message has a signature
[snip]
It's "DomainKeys" and not "Domain Keys".
Regards,
-sm
>...
>On Montag, 12. Juni 2006 10:03 Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
>> On 12 Jun 2006, at 07:53, Michael Monnerie wrote:
>> > yesterday I've got some new kind of spam:
>> >
>> > X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Received: from abruxateatro.com (unknown [210.245.161.31])
>> >by power2u.go
>>
>> So, that domain at least exists. Could there be a check for whether a=20
>> domain has an MX record, and if not give it some points? Would make=20
>> sense, I guess, because normally e-mail is two-way...
>>
>> And what about the acidstufftv.com domain?
>>
Hi Michael,
I think the rules sa
Mr. Santerre said:
> Interesting point there, and I'm about to go a little off topic.
> IMHO, an Admins job should be to learn anything that does the
> job right.
Well, for some value of 'right' - definitions vary, and often what
management considers 'right' differs from mine. However:
> I've f
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, June 13, 2006 10:21 am, slyandjen said:
Does SpamAssassin have it's own whitelist / blacklist
Of course.
if yes where is it located?
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
or
/home/$USER/.spamassassin/user_prefs
when is the configuration file to enable this
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
One remark I haven't seen yet is that the "DomainKey-Signature:" field can
include an "h" tag, which specifies which header fields are included in the
signature. If that tag is included (and I think it usually is(?)) and there
aren't already any X-Spam-* fields that have
On Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 20:53 List Mail User wrote:
> You don't need a 'MX' - fallback to 'A' is still part of the
> standards.
Pfff - I'm so long in the business and never got aware of this. Possibly
because until now every(body|domain) has had MX records.
> http://whois.domaintools.
On Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 17:43 Chris Santerre wrote:
> Webmin won't always be there for you!
Amen.
LOL, some very good words that could be heard at the end of an episode
of "outer limits". *g*
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531
On Jun 9, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
After considerable experimenting and thinking things through I thought
I'd start a thread on the future of email to start planting the seeds
of
where MTA development needs to go. I'm convinced that someday soon we
will all realize that MBOX and M
On Jun 9, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
MS Exchange... one big Database
Exactly...
And that is one reason why I wouldn't touch this SQL idea with a 10
foot
pole.. the fact that Exchange works this way only proves my point... I
hear
all the time about Exchange servers crashing and t
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:49 PM, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
If we are talking about making a SQL application that is usable for
a multitude of people then why lock them into something. That's the
easiest way to drive them away from supporting it.
Word. Perl can play nice with plenty of RDBMSs.
John Rudd wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
After considerable experimenting and thinking things through I thought
I'd start a thread on the future of email to start planting the seeds of
where MTA development needs to go. I'm convinced that someday soon we
will all reali
John Rudd wrote:
I had been thinking about how feasible it would be to re-implement
dbmail in perl..
and maybe a decent perl MTA to put in front of it too (something that
will work with sendmail milters...).
Then you could be pretty database agnostic. Just whatever perl wants
to put ba
This is still visionary so take it for what it's worth. People are more
familiar with MAILDIR and MBOX because they are files. You can read them
with VI and PICO and FGREP and all the stuff that we are familiar with.
MySQL is also easy but might require new tools and some learning. Once
you bec
Stuck in a loop.
New to SpamAssassin
Installed per
http://www.geekly.com/entries/archives/0155.htm
steps 1 through 8
(at step 3 I was confused about the use of sendmail which was moved to
sendmail.sendmail
when postfix was installed and also installed was sendmail.postfix - I
chose send
On Jun 13, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
and maybe a decent perl MTA to put in front of it too (something that
will work with sendmail milters...).
I think that a local delivery program could be written fairly easily
that Exim or any other existing MTA could pip
John Rudd wrote:
On Jun 13, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
and maybe a decent perl MTA to put in front of it too (something
that will work with sendmail milters...).
I think that a local delivery program could be written fairly easily
that Exim or any other ex
Thank you for a very well thought out *open* message. I would guess that most of
these reasons are why DBMail was started 5 years ago ;)
I'm gonna response with some pro-DBMail stuff... just because it's in my head
and pretty much addresses all of Marc's comments below.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Thi
John Ackley wrote:
> Installed per
> http://www.geekly.com/entries/archives/0155.htm
>steps 1 through 8
Are you installing this for your own personal use? Or for the use of
a larger group of people getting mail through a server? Because those
directions are integrating spamassassin tighl
25 matches
Mail list logo
