Oops - drug rules need more work

2005-05-08 Thread jdow
This text sailed right through all the SARE rules except one ratware rule: ===8<--- X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, RATWR10a_MESSID,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 Status: You will see how great this storewide ssale is. Customers can sav a

Re: Confession and rage

2005-05-08 Thread Martin G. Diehl
Stewart, John wrote: [snip] The opt-out was to email back to the address and ask to be removed. The problem was that no one was regularly checking this address. I spoke to the co-owner again about this and it sounds like they are putting in a procedure to check this account regularly. johnS No

Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ

2005-05-08 Thread Chris
I seem to be having another problem with getting the above ruleset again. Anyone else: Date: Sat May  7 03:02:21 2005 From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour Run Summary on cpollock.localdomain: The following rules had errors: Tim Jackson's (et al) bogus virus warni

RE: Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ

2005-05-08 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 8:59 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ > > > I seem to be having another problem with getting the above > ruleset again. > Anyone else: > > Date: Sa

Re: Oops - drug rules need more work

2005-05-08 Thread List Mail User
missionandgoal. com has made [ob] on SURBL, but it also hits the rfci lists for "whois", "postmaster", "DSN" and "bogusmx" - the "abuse" nomination is pending. Paul Shupak [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ

2005-05-08 Thread Tim Jackson
On Sun, 8 May 2005 08:59:11 -0500 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I seem to be having another problem with getting the above ruleset > again. By all means feel free to contact me direct if you think it's something up my end. However, if it's just a one-off then ignore it; it's probably just l

Re: Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ

2005-05-08 Thread Chris
On Sunday 08 May 2005 12:44 pm, Tim Jackson wrote: > By all means feel free to contact me direct if you think it's something > up my end. However, if it's just a one-off then ignore it; it's > probably just load issues or something my end. The host my rules are on > did "mysteriously crash" this m

blackholes.five-ten-sg.com

2005-05-08 Thread wolfgang
after viewing http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php?221.143.43.231 I would like to use the 127.0.0.2 section of blackholes.five-ten-sg.com in a Received: header rule in SpamAssassin 3.0.2. what would be the syntax for a rule that does such a PTR lookup like $ host 231.43.143.221.blackholes.f

RE: blackholes.five-ten-sg.com

2005-05-08 Thread martin smith
M>-Original Message- M>From: wolfgang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M>Sent: 08 May 2005 21:19 M>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org M>Subject: blackholes.five-ten-sg.com M> M>after viewing M>http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php?221.143.43.231 I M>would like to use the 127.0.0.2 section of

Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org

2005-05-08 Thread Joshua Tinnin
Sorry it took a while ... On Sat 7 May 05 16:23, "Martin G. Diehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > [thanks for your response] > > > On Sat 7 May 05 07:01, "Martin G. Diehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Greetings, > >> > >>I am seeing some SpamAssassin eMail messages fla

Problem with SA/spamass-milter/MySQL/bayes.

2005-05-08 Thread Steven W. Orr
Since I switched over to using MySQL to hold the userprefs, awl and bayes, I see that the bayes processing no longer functions. Here's the relevant bayes debug output for a message that comes in addresed to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): debug: bayes: Using username: root debug: bayes: Database connec

Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org

2005-05-08 Thread Thomas Cameron
so I whitelist on: List-Id: Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this? Thanks! Thomas

Re: Oops - drug rules need more work

2005-05-08 Thread mouss
List Mail User wrote: missionandgoal. com has made [ob] on SURBL, but it also hits the rfci lists for "whois", "postmaster", "DSN" and "bogusmx" - the "abuse" nomination is pending. rfci lists so many people that one can't rely on (they liste yahoo, aol, hotmail, ) except for a personal sit

Re: Oops - drug rules need more work

2005-05-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 09:59 PM 5/8/2005, mouss wrote: rfci lists so many people that one can't rely on (they liste yahoo, aol, hotmail, ) except for a personal site (or a company where you can enforce your rules). A fashist approach might (seem to) work, but it'll never solve the real problems. /Agree.. I use

Re: Oops - drug rules need more work

2005-05-08 Thread List Mail User
>... > >At 09:59 PM 5/8/2005, mouss wrote: >>rfci lists so many people that one can't rely on (they liste yahoo, aol, >>hotmail, ) except for a personal site (or a company where you can >>enforce your rules). A fashist approach might (seem to) work, but it'll >>never solve the real problems.