--On Friday, September 24, 2004 04:37:05 -0400 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the
FreeBSD port makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the
dependencies, but FreeBSD doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP
or IP::Country::Fast, s
I try to install Spamassassin v 3.0 with perl 5.8.5 and i have this error
/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i686-linux/auto/DBI/DBI.so: undefined symbol:
perl_get_sv
abusquets wrote:
I try to install Spamassassin v 3.0 with perl 5.8.5 and i have this error
/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i686-linux/auto/DBI/DBI.so: undefined symbol:
perl_get_sv
I had funky problem which referenced /DBI/DBI.so which I fixed re
Hi all,
Another question:
Short version: will spam report header lines from other spam filters
confuse sa-learn?
Long version:
I have a second email account that I have set to forward into my main
email account. It turns out that this second email account has a
spam-checker on it. I've included
Hi jdow,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, jdow wrote:
> From: "Gregory Zornetzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I would like to train the Bayesian filter with these
> > messages, so using pine, I put them in a mail folder called spam, and I
> > run sa-learn on it as follows:
> > sa-learn --spam --mbox --showdo
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 00:21:44 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
+-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
| to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability
| in the API. For exa
Pat Lashley wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running Exim with Exiscan version 22, built from
the port, and it's working fin
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Gregory Zornetzer wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, jdow wrote:
> > From: "Gregory Zornetzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Generally, I notice that sa-learn processes exactly one more message than
> > > I thought was in the folder. When I take a look in the folder with a text
>
Hello list,
Just upgraded my server (debian sarge, postfix
2.1.4, SA 2.6.4) to SA v3;
After making all the necessary changes to my config
files everything seems to be Ok but one anoyance...
I have rewrite_headers Subject blabla, it only tags
the subject if the is a subject header in th
The header for the mail in question:
Received: from yahoo.com (unknown [222.64.199.246])
by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 867744B3C7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:46:58 -0600 (MDT)
The SA 3.0.0 report snippet:
Content analysis details: (4.8 poi
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Theodore Heise wrote:
> I've been pointing sa-learn at Pine mail folders now for over two
> years, and just ignoring the fact it's learning from the Pine folder
> header. I don't expect to actually get any e-mail resembling it.
> During this time Bayes has always worked ver
+-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley écrivait :
| --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
|>| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
|>| to the existing SA port;
On Thursday 23 September 2004 19:33, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD
> ports for the new SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is
> scheduled?
>
> Thanks!
Since it's in limbo right now, install using CPAN. Quite
painless really. (Assuming that you h
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
module? I can create it if you like.
(I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating a port 00
is there one?)
A menu-based config (like the one for the mod_php)
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create a
Bundle package that installs them? Possibly a
Bundle::Spamassassin::Optional as well for the non-crucial features?
-Dan Mahoney
--
"Be happy. Try no
+-le 25/09/2004 13:21 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin écrivait :
| On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|
| Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
| module? I can create it if you like.
|
| (I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating
+-le 25/09/2004 11:38 -0600, Sherwood Botsford écrivait :
| On Thursday 23 September 2004 19:33, Jack L. Stone wrote:
|> Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD
|> ports for the new SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is
|> scheduled?
|>
|> Thanks!
|
| Since it's in limbo right
Howdy all -
I downloaded Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.tar.bz2 and used the included
spamassassin.spec file to build RPMs on my Fedora Core 2 machine. However,
when I tried to install them I got an error telling me that I needed
perl(Parse::Syslog) and perl(Statistics::Distributions).
The search for
Hi,
Not mine, but I've had good results with the Gaim packages from here:
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/rpm-navigation.php?cat=Network%2Fspamassassin/
hth,
-- Bob
At 18:23 25/09/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create a
Bundle package that installs them? Possibly a
Bundle::Spamassassin::Optional as well for the non
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Julian Field wrote:
At 18:23 25/09/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create a
Bundle package that installs them? Possibly a
Bundle::S
At 19:11 25/09/2004, you wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Julian Field wrote:
At 18:23 25/09/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create
a Bundle package that insta
Hi all. Hoping someone might be able to help me out here. Just
upgraded from 2.6x to 3.0.0 this morning, and, though I followed the
Bayes DB upgrade steps in the UPGRADE file to a T, my token names all
seem to be garbage now.
Here's a few lines of the output from "sa-learn --dump all":
0.560
Hi,
Since I got no response for the msg below, I'd like
to add that this is the case only when report_safe is 0, works fine for
report_safe 1.
Is this list the right place for this kind of
queries? please direct me if it is not.
D.
- Original Message -
From: Dudi Goldenberg
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create
a Bundle package that installs them? Possibly a
Bundle::Spamassassin::Optional as well for the non-crucial features?
-
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:26:04 +0100 Julian Field <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. I tend to steer clear of CPAN for large packages, it is far too
> keen on upgrading my entire Perl installation instead of just installing
> the few modules I actually need.
Then you have a very, very old
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 06:38:48PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:30:36PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Shouldn't the SA build & test process be a little more verbose about
> > this, though, and at least spit out some warnings about missing Perl
> > modules? While the
From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The header for the mail in question:
>
> Received: from yahoo.com (unknown [222.64.199.246])
> by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 867744B3C7
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:46:58 -0600 (MDT)
>
> The SA 3.0.0 rep
Hi all,
I have 3.0 up and running using SQL prefs/awl/bayes on a new server.
All works great - test messages work, sa-learn works, etc. We are ready
to start migrating users off the old server.
My problem is in migrating my existing 2.64 bayes databases to to the
new SQL configuration on the n
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:59:57PM -0500, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
> Hi all. Hoping someone might be able to help me out here. Just
> upgraded from 2.6x to 3.0.0 this morning, and, though I followed the
> Bayes DB upgrade steps in the UPGRADE file to a T, my token names all
> seem to be garbage now.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:53:51PM -0700, Chris Bradfield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have 3.0 up and running using SQL prefs/awl/bayes on a new server.
> All works great - test messages work, sa-learn works, etc. We are ready
> to start migrating users off the old server.
>
> My problem is in migr
I'm not quite sure where to begin debugging this one.
I'm running MIMEDefang 2.44 with SpamAssassin 3, and everything is
working great - except SpamAssassin's 'look up URLs against DNS
blocklists' feature.
The odd part is that it seems to be working when I run SpamAssassin in
debug mode, but not
jdow wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I could find no other scores for that rule in system or private
> > rules.
>
> You overrode it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or if you use per user
> preferences in your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs files?
I thought maybe so too. But as I said, I could find
Snowjack wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:08:38 -0700:
> Am I missing something?
>
Yes, all the SARE and other custom rulesets ;-) (Just as a FYI, not as a
critique).
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:41:42 +0300:
> I just want to
> know, how much faster SpamAssassin will be, if its Bayesian engine is
> replaced with something else,
>
Not much. You are completely missing the point. If you want to have
something faster and less ressource hungry (
Robert Menschel wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:35:35 -0700:
> If they are, trim your 70_sare_header and 70_sare_html down to the
> "file 0" file for best performance.
>
What do you mean by this?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conacti
FWIW, the problem seems to have been RC2-specific. Didn't occur after it,
now going from RC4 to RTM next week. Thanks for all the great work!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winwar
Avi Shatz wrote on Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:13:43 +0300:
> The only thing I wanted to prove with this is that line, that is
> created by my local mail server (the last hop, and the most important
> one for SPF), does indeed contains the EHLO string that isn't detected
> correctly by SA 3.0rc5.
>
But y
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 12:47:20 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, just as a note, the latest ExiScan is 27, for Exim 4.42.
Is that in the ports tree yet? I know they've been under a freeze
for a while now.
Yep, that's the current port versions.
-Pat
Hello Kai,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 1:34:07 PM, you wrote:
KS> Robert Menschel wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:35:35 -0700:
>> If they are, trim your 70_sare_header and 70_sare_html down to the
>> "file 0" file for best performance.
KS> What do you mean by this?
SARE's header, html, and genls
From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jdow wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > I could find no other scores for that rule in system or private
> > > rules.
> >
> > You overrode it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or if you use per
user
> > preferences in your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs files?
>
This bug was recently fixed (and its working here):
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
So there isn't really much point in this anymore.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 10:34 PM
To: users@spamassa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> But in 50_scores.cf I see that all columns have points. I could find
> no other scores for that rule in system or private rules.
>
> score RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM 0.899 0.034 0.969 0.424
> score NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO 0.025 0.024 0.601 0.016
>
> So could
Looks like you are running scoreset 1, and 0.034 (or 0.024) rounds to 0.0 in
the display.
Loren
>pts rule name description
> -- ---
>0.0 RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM Received contains a faked HELO hostname
>
Michael Parker wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:53:51PM -0700, Chris Bradfield wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3.0 up and running using SQL prefs/awl/bayes on a new server.
All works great - test messages work, sa-learn works, etc. We are ready
to start migrating users off the old server.
My problem is
This is a known feature, and there are open bugs
claiming that it is a problem rather than a feature for end users. I think
we reached a somewhat concensus a few days ago among many of the devs that this
can in fact be changed, and the code to remove markup can still be made to work
correct
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 02:59:33PM -0700, Chris Bradfield wrote:
>
> Thanks, I did read that, but upgrading the server to 3.0 is not really
> an option. What I was wondering is if anybody has come up with a way of
> porting the old data over to a new 3.0 server.
>
It's possible, just takes ti
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Snowjack wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:08:38 -0700:
Am I missing something?
Yes, all the SARE and other custom rulesets ;-) (Just as a FYI, not as a
critique).
Actually, those numbers were from SA 2.64 with the URIDNSBL patch and
most of the more conservative SARE rulesets. Did
At 07:32 PM 9.25.2004 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
>
>+-le 25/09/2004 11:38 -0600, Sherwood Botsford écrivait :
>| On Thursday 23 September 2004 19:33, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>|> Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD
>|> ports for the new SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is
>|
Bob Proulx wrote:
>0.0 RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM Received contains a faked HELO hostname
>2.2 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received'
> headers
> score RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM 0.899 0.034 0.969 0.424
Thanks to jdow and also to Bob Menschel who mailed me offlist I no
51 matches
Mail list logo
