On 01/08/11 12:23, Mark Martinec wrote:
Ned,
On the same basis that some DNSWLs have high, medium and low scores
depending upon the level of trust, I'm wondering if it would be useful
to have user defined high, medium and low scores available to rules such
as whitelist_from_dki
Greg Troxel writes:
> > whitelist_from_dkim_low
> > whitelist_from_dkim_med
> > whitelist_from_dkim_high
>
> That would be ok, but I'd also like to see
>
> whitelist_from_dkim_score -2.3 foo.com
>
> so that white/blacklisting in general could assign arbitrary score
> values.
I agree, I felt a
Ned Slider writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On the same basis that some DNSWLs have high, medium and low scores
> depending upon the level of trust, I'm wondering if it would be useful
> to have user defined high, medium and low scores available to rules
> such as
Ned,
> On the same basis that some DNSWLs have high, medium and low scores
> depending upon the level of trust, I'm wondering if it would be useful
> to have user defined high, medium and low scores available to rules such
> as whitelist_from_dkim and whitelist_from_spf s
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:41:12 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
whitelist_from_dkim_low
if is dkim_valid
whitelist_from_dkim_med
if is def_whitelist_from_dkim
whitelist_from_dkim_high
if is whilist_from_dkim
why complicate it ?
Hi all,
On the same basis that some DNSWLs have high, medium and low scores
depending upon the level of trust, I'm wondering if it would be useful
to have user defined high, medium and low scores available to rules such
as whitelist_from_dkim and whitelist_from_spf so mail admins can
On 7/10/11 5:01 PM, Chris wrote:
SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
shows the dkim signature to be invalid. Is there a reason why that would
be? When SA is ran against it a 2nd time then I guess it's failing
verification?
guess so. you can find out why, and fix it.
or, give up and use
ur split zone dns has your dkim dns
> entries.
>
> google for dkim test email address's.
> make sure there isn't something killing your headers.
>
> (hint: you cannot whitelist_from_dkim if the dkim signature is invalid!)
>
>
>
Michael, when the message or
make sure there isn't something killing your headers.
(hint: you cannot whitelist_from_dkim if the dkim signature is invalid!)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusi
I seem to be having some issues getting this correct in my local.cf file
to get shortcircuit working. For instance, adding
whitelist_from_dkim *@us.army.mil
when SA is ran against a message that I sent myself from work the output
is:
-2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:24 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
> >
> > > Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
> >
> > tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
> >
> That's no
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
>
> > Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
>
> tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
>
That's normal. The HTML generated by word processors, etc is seldom
clean but every
On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
In absence of the second parameter, whitelist_from_dkim
whitelists only on author signatures.
this makes it simple to dump address books from horde
..@mcsv129.net,
> author keine-antw...@community36.net,
> no valid matches
> [22718] dbg: dkim: author keine-antw...@community36.net,
> not in any dkim whitelist
> third party domain need to be whitelisted ? (Mail-DKIM 0.31, sa 3.2.5)
Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
In
On Tue 08 Sep 2009 10:04:21 AM CEST, Per Jessen wrote
Still when it is checked by DIM, it reports "author
keine-antw...@community36.net, not in any dkim whitelist".
correct it happends here aswell
[22718] dbg: dkim: performing public key lookup and signature verification
[22718] dbg: dkim: sig
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
[snip]
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.net mcsv129.net
>
Just to confirm that it works:
dkim: author keine-antw...@community36.net, WHITELISTED by
whitelist_from_dkim
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
> Without the second argument to whitelist_from_dkim, it checks for
> author signatures, as documented. In your case the mail carries a
> signature by domain mcsv129.net, so you have a third-party signature
> there.
>
> If you want to whi
Per,
> >> http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
> >> whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.net
> >>
> >> The actual author is 'keine-antw...@community36.net'; I have run it
> >> through SA with debug on and I see it being added to whit
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 08.09.09 10:04, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I still don't seem to be getting more friendly with
>> whitelist_from_dkim -
>>
>> could someone please try feeding this email through your SA setup:
>>
>> http://jessen.ch/fi
On 08.09.09 10:04, Per Jessen wrote:
> I still don't seem to be getting more friendly with
> whitelist_from_dkim -
>
> could someone please try feeding this email through your SA setup:
>
> http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
>
> with this enabled:
>
> w
SA list,
I still don't seem to be getting more friendly with
whitelist_from_dkim -
could someone please try feeding this email through your SA setup:
http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
with this enabled:
whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.net
The actual author is '
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:01:09 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> http://jessen.ch/files/sa-lint-debug.txt
old Mail::DKIM (0.32) (0.36 latest)
and warn on netset
Mail::Domainkeys is not needed, check that you dont load it in pre files
--
Benny Pedersen
Per Jessen wrote:
> http://jessen.ch/files/belo-news-dkim-testmsg.output3
> Notice:
>
> # grep cond_clause.*DKIM /tmp/belo-news-dkim-testmsg.output3
> dbg: cond_clause_plugin_loaded: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM=1
> dbg: cond_clause_plugin_loaded: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM=1
> dbg: con
Per Jessen wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> One very suspicious line is:
>>
>> "dkim: no wl entries match author pen...@belo-news.com, no need to
>> verify sigs"
>>
>> Despite my config:
>>
>> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin:
Per Jessen wrote:
> One very suspicious line is:
>
> "dkim: no wl entries match author pen...@belo-news.com, no need to
> verify sigs"
>
> Despite my config:
>
> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@belo-news.com
> endif
>
Just ran a test like that -
http://jessen.ch/files/belo-news-dkim-testmsg.output
One very suspicious line is:
"dkim: no wl entries match author pen...@belo-news.com, no need to
verify sigs"
Despite my config:
ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
whitelist_from_dkim *...@belo-news.com
endif
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per,
> The lint test-message presumably wouldn't cause DKIM_VERIFIED to hit
> anyway, but DNS is most definitely enabled.
Please send the debug output on a real signed message run, e.g.:
spamassassin -D -t test.log 2>&1
Mark
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
>> >> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
>> >> whitelisting doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing
>> >> wrong?
>> >
>> > this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
>>
>> Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows
Per,
> >> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
> >> whitelisting
> >> doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
>
> Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows no problems.
>
> > output from spa
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
>> whitelisting
>> doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
>
> this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows no problems.
> output from s
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:41:51 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> My ruleset contains lines like this:
>
> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@example.com
> endif
i would use def_whitelist_from_dkim with wildcard user, just me, but imho
better
My ruleset contains lines like this:
ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
whitelist_from_dkim *...@example.com
endif
I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the whitelisting
doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
32 matches
Mail list logo
