On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:24 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote > > > > > Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted. > > > > tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :) > > > That's normal. The HTML generated by word processors, etc is seldom > clean but everything I've seen MS Office generate has been abominable: > just a steaming heap of fetid dingo's kidneys.
Now wait just a second. It would have to improve, greatly, to be a steaming heap of fetid dingo kidneys. Maybe rancid squirrel pancreases, but in no way would it reach the level of dingo kidneys.... -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
