Re: stop-at-threshold

2006-07-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:04:57AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote: > > and throws a warning. So, the short short version about why it went away > > (you > > can search the archives/bugzilla if you want) is that it didn't work right, > > and potentially made things slower. > > Searched for it, even

Re: stop-at-threshold

2006-07-19 Thread Jose Celestino
Words by Theo Van Dinter [Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:49:35PM -0400]: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:37:10AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote: > > Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with > > Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option

Re: stop-at-threshold

2006-07-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:37:10AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote: > Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with > Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the > same effect? Yes and no. ... Ok, so first, stop-at-threshold was

stop-at-threshold

2006-07-19 Thread Jose Celestino
Hello. Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the same effect? Thank you. -- Jose Celestino | http://xpto.org/~japc/files/japc-