On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:34 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Karsten Brckelmann wrote:
>
> > (a) Do you scan *all* messages, regardless of their size? Don't do that,
> > but skip scanning for messages larger than about 500 kByte.
>
> If I remember his spamc options correctly, it w
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
yes, we have configured the SA to 20 children
Try setting it to 5.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
(a) Do you scan *all* messages, regardless of their size? Don't do that,
but skip scanning for messages larger than about 500 kByte.
If I remember his spamc options correctly, it was limited to 200kB.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhtt
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 22:53 +, Luis campo wrote:
> yes, we have configured the SA to 20 children
I know. I stated that fact myself.
OK, I'm out. That doesn't even remotely answer any new question I asked
or asked again, since it was left unanswered by you before. You can even
read all the st
l/spamd &
echo "spamd started"
;;
memory rises after the spamd stopped working
> Subject: Re: FW: SpamAssassin error Interrupted system call
> From: guent...@rudersport.de
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:50:10 +0200
>
>
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:18 +, Luis campo wrote:
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem: 10334681012956 20512 0 71440 270720
> -/+ buffers/cache: 670796 362672
> Swap: 2031608 02031608
OK, no
cr_2...@hotmail.com
> CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: SpamAssassin error Interrupted system call
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
>
> > this is an example of var / log / qmail / spamd
> >
> > 2009-06-03 12:00:16.531889500 [19168] info: p
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
this is an example of var / log / qmail / spamd
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531889500 [19168] info: prefork: child states:
BB
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531949500 [19168] info: prefork: server reached
--max-children setting, consider raising
Quoting Luis campo :
The service is still active spamd just does not process the emails,
all giving a score of zero and then get the error message
ServerA spamc [7277]: connect to spamd on 172.16.0.14
> Failed, retrying (# 1 of 3): Interrupted system call
When this problem occurs restar
Quoting Luis campo :
The service is still active spamd just does not process the emails,
all giving a score of zero and then get the error message
ServerA spamc [7277]: connect to spamd on 172.16.0.14
> Failed, retrying (# 1 of 3): Interrupted system call
When this problem occurs restarte
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 16:23 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
> > > user_scores_sql_usernamespamuser
> >
> > Any chance your SQL backend actually is the culprit and taking way to
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 22:54 +, Luis campo wrote:
user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
user_scores_sql_usernamespamuser
Any chance your SQL backend actually is the culprit and taking way too
long?
Especi
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 22:54 +, Luis campo wrote:
> We have increased the 20 as well as samples:
That's not exactly slowly, as I suggested. Well, your server, feel free
to kill it.
> In simscan have configured as follows
>
> . / configure - enable-clamav = y - enable-clamdscan = / usr / lo
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
In simscan have configured as follows
- enable-per-domain = y - enable-attach = y - enable-spam = y -
enable-ripmime = / usr / local / bin / ripmime - enable-received = y -
enable -
spam-hits = 5.0 - enable-spamc = / usr / bin / spamc -
enable-spamc-args =-
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
this is an example of var / log / qmail / spamd
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531889500 [19168] info: prefork: child states: BB
2009-06-03 12:00:16.531949500 [19168] info: prefork: server reached
--max-children setting, consider raising it
There is a probl
score BAYES_99 5.5 # 5.4
score RAZOR2_CHECK 2.5 # 0.899
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 4.5# 1.552
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_11_50 1.5 # 0.559
score DCC_CHECK 3.0 # 1.806
score PYZOR_CHECK 3.0 # 0.322
> Subje
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 22:00 +, Luis campo wrote:
> this is an example of var / log / qmail / spamd
>
> 2009-06-03 12:00:16.471682500 [775] info: spamd: result: Y 15 -
> DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CH
luence on our server reaches around 75,000 emails received daily.
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:09:45 -0700
> From: jhar...@impsec.org
> To: lcr_2...@hotmail.com
> CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: SpamAssassin error Interrupted system call
>
> On Wed, 3 J
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
There are a bunch of word-triplets in the copy-n-paste, re-arranged
randomly, making the text hard to comprehend -- a repeating pattern all
over the reply.
Yeah, I suspect he's using Babelfish or some such to translate to ...
Spanish perhaps?
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:09 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
> > > Does the maillog file on the machine running spamd log have any
> > > messages that might indicate problems at the time the err
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
Is spamd running on the same machine?
if spamd is running on the same machine.
Does the maillog file on the machine running spamd log have any
messages that might indicate problems at the time the error occurred?
mailog I get this:
ServerA spamc [727
; CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: SpamAssassin error Interrupted system call
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
>
> > The service is still active spamd just does not process the emails, all
> > giving a score of zero and then get the er
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
The service is still active spamd just does not process the emails, all
giving a score of zero and then get the error message
ServerA spamc [7277]: connect to spamd on 172.16.0.14
> Failed, retrying (# 1 of 3): Interrupted system call
When this problem oc
uns approximately 20 minutes and
then switch back to the same problem.
that might be happening.
thanks
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:33:39 -0700
> From: jhar...@impsec.org
> To: lcr_2...@hotmail.com
> CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin error Interrupted s
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Luis campo wrote:
We have installed SpamAssassin 3.25 working with qmail Simscan ClamAV.
The problem is that spam works a few minutes then let it pass all
messages giving a score of 0.00 in the log and see the siguientre
message:
Jun 2 11:31:26 ServerAS spamc[7259]: connec
We have installed SpamAssassin 3.25 working with qmail Simscan ClamAV.
The problem is that spam works a few minutes then let it pass all
messages giving a score of 0.00 in the log and see the siguientre
message:
Jun 2 11:31:26 ServerAS spamc[7259]: connect to spamd on 172.16.0.14
fa
We have installed SpamAssassin 3.25 working with qmail Simscan ClamAV.
The problem is that spam works a few minutes then let it pass all
messages giving a score of 0.00 in the log and see the siguientre
message:
Jun 2 11:31:26 ServerAS spamc[7259]: connect to spamd on 172.16.0.14
failed, re
8 11:38:23 profactory spamd[7211]: Still running as root: user not
specified with -u, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
How can i solve this problem?
Thanks,
Anderson
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spamassassin-error-tf2292201.html#a6366733
Sent from the Sp
Robert Swan wrote:
> I was running “spamassassin –lint” on some new rules I had created and
> noticed an error but don’t know where to look. I have pasted it below
> does anyone know which file this error might be in?
>
>
>
>
>
> Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax e
I was running “spamassassin –lint” on some
new rules I had created and noticed an error but don’t know where to
look. I have pasted it below does anyone know which file this error might be
in?
Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax
error at (eval 65) line 440, n
I was running “spamassassin –lint” on some
new rules I had created and noticed an error but don’t know where to
look. I have pasted it below does anyone know which file this error might be
in?
Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax
error at (eval 65) line 440, n
Hi,
I am posting this to both the Mimedefang list and the Spamassassin list
since I'm not exactly sure if this is a Mimedefang problem or a
Spamassassin one.
I have installed spamassassin 2.20 (I think) in conjunction with Mimedefang
2.51 on a FreeBSD 4.6 box running Sendmail 8.13
When I star
Has anyone seen this type of error message? Known bug that is fixed?
Am running on SuSE 9.1, SA v2.64-3.2.
> Use of uninitialized value in length at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 457.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/v
I don't know if the below message got forwarded to this list, but
it didn't come back as non-existant or non-deliverable. Only
found out about this list when I searched for the mail lists on
source forge and found it had moved...
Original Message
Subject: spamassa
At 04:03 PM 10/27/2004, Gary Manigault wrote:
=
Oct 27 14:55:08 AREA51 spamd[23120]: Couldn't create readable
default_prefs for [//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Oct 27 14:55:49 AREA51 spamd[23162]: Creating default_prefs
[//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
=
It seems like spamd is the culprit but I
Title: Message
I am running
Postfix, Procmail, SpamC / SpamD and I am getting the following messages
occassionally.
=
Oct 27 14:55:08
AREA51 spamd[23120]: Couldn't create readable default_prefs for
[//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Oct 27 14:55:49
AREA51 spamd[23162]: Creating default_pre
36 matches
Mail list logo
