>
>> This sagrey plugin sounds great, I'm giving it a try now. Thanks for
>> the info.
>
> I'd be wary about that. Personally, the FPs I've had in the past have
> overwhelmingly "first contact".
I've been giving it a whirl and adjusted the score down a little bit..
So far, it's been doing gr
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:35:38 -0500
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
>
> This sagrey plugin sounds great, I'm giving it a try now. Thanks for
> the info.
I'd be wary about that. Personally, the FPs I've had in the past have
overwhelmingly "first contact".
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Alex wrote:
Hi,
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution (des
Alex wrote:
Hi,
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution (despite it not having bee
Hi,
>> 1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
>
> Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
> this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution (despite it not having been updated
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Den 2012-02-23 18:50, Jonathan Nichols skrev:
>
>> Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to
>> look into this evening
>
> setup awl to mask on /32 and keep awl factor at 0.5
>
> then follow the plugin guide
T
Den 2012-02-23 18:50, Jonathan Nichols skrev:
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to
look into this evening
setup awl to mask on /32 and keep awl factor at 0.5
then follow the plugin guide
>
> 1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
>
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
Den 2012-02-23 18:10, Jonathan Nichols skrev:
http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
Content analysis details: (6.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.7 URIBL_DB
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:10:13 -0500
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Two examples from the past half hour alone:
>
> http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
>
> http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
>
> I'm getting flooded with spam these days. Bayes is on,
>... and things are still sailing right through with low scores.
On 2/23/2012 12:19 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Amavis is stamping it. The rest of the header info is below in the
pastebin sample.
Roger, I see that now. Missed the split.
And just my luck.. *now* it's showing up in Razor and URIBL. Argh!
It's as if spammers are using me as a crash test dummy
Amavis is stamping it. The rest of the header info is below in the pastebin
sample.
And just my luck.. *now* it's showing up in Razor and URIBL. Argh! It's as if
spammers are using me as a crash test dummy this year. :/
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> How is the email
How is the email getting into your server? The only received header
is localhost...
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heap.pbp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27604E44DB
for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:25 -0600
(CST)
testing the times
Two examples from the past half hour alone:
http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
I'm getting flooded with spam these days. Bayes is on, I'm using the built-in
RBLs, hostkarma, mailspike, BRBL, botnet & freemail plugin, pyzor, razor.. and
things are still sailing right thro
14 matches
Mail list logo
