Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

The message you sent directly to me hit the following: * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level * above 50% * [cf:

Re: {SPAM}{!} Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > the spam > and no I haven't done any bayes training. and dns is working. Are you running with SpamAssassin's built-in support for RBLs and URIBLs? That message text got *TORN UP* by the URIBLs on my system: X-EVI-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=15.259, r

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

the spamHi RobarIt is sad but it is true that the large groups of women are unhappy withthe size of there BF is thing. Don't be that guy,www.missusoandforever.org/ab1/ . and station, designed been grabbed theorized to artistThank youi run rulesTRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_STOCKS TRIPWIRE SARE_EVILNUMBERS

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com I have required of 3

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > > *X-Spam-Status:* No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham > version=3.0.4 > *X-Spam-Level:* * > *X-Spam-Checker-Version:* SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on > agwebinc.com As far as the autolearner is concerned, the score of that me

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com I have required of 3 which you can see and i have the milter rejecting email w/ score more than 7On 5/10/06, Matt Kettl

RE: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=ham This means that the spam is being given a very low score from SA. The score used here does not include the Bayes scoring, but if you learn very many like this, then the effectiveness of your Bayes database will drop. > I

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=ham > > I was wondering the best way to correct this? Depends.. Really you first need to figure out why it this happened before you take any action at all. Can you post a X-Spam-Status header for one of the messages? Have

spam getting autolearn=ham problem

more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=hamI was wondering the best way to correct this? I was going to delete the bayes and whitelist files and start over but I thought I would see what you do when this happens. my setupusing fc4sendmailspamass-milter - one bayes file for all users on s