Am 20.04.2015 um 20:52 schrieb richard lucassen:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:42:21 +0200
Mikael Syska wrote:
I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:42:21 +0200
Mikael Syska wrote:
> > I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
> > perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
> > hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not an SA guru
> > BTW.
> >
> > But since a f
On 19.04.15 22:38, richard lucassen wrote:
I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not an SA guru BTW.
But since a few weeks SA has got picky on just a
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:38 PM, richard lucassen <
mailingli...@lucassen.org> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
> perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
> hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly
Am 19.04.2015 um 22:38 schrieb richard lucassen:
Hello list,
I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not an SA guru BTW.
But since a few weeks SA has
Hello list,
I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working
perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle
hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not an SA guru BTW.
But since a few weeks SA has got picky on just a few people, just a few
mail add