Am 20.04.2015 um 20:52 schrieb richard lucassen:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:42:21 +0200 Mikael Syska <mik...@syska.dk> wrote:I've been using SA for a log time now an it has always been working perfectly well. It runs on a bunch of Postfix servers that handle hundreds of thousands mails per day. I'm certainly not an SA guru BTW. But since a few weeks SA has got picky on just a few people, just a few mail addresses. As soon as they send a normal mail, SA immediately puts a very high score of around 8 or so to it. I have seen this only once in the past (a year or six ago) and putting the address to the whitelist did the job. I can resolve these problems once again by adding the addresses to the whitelist, but does anyone have an idea what's going on here?First thing that comes to my mind ... What rules does these mails get hit by? :-) Hard de debug anything with almost no information.Just tried today to see what happens and to produce some verbose logs
nobody needs a "verbose log"every scanned messages produces a log-line like below which shows the rules a message hit as it was received
spamd: result: Y 9 - BAYES_50,CUST_DNSBL_21,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,PYZOR_CHECK,SPF_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD scantime=1.8,size=7400,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.5,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=34962,mid=<p2034.02s41iepjpokdounvaohi4jguhrrn...@spartipp.org>,bayes=0.486808,autolearn=disabled
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
