On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:44AM -0600, Chris Thielen wrote:
> That said, my opinion is that YES indeed this is a replacement for RDJ
> in at least the SARE. I'm sorta waiting for the sa-update framework to
> gel a bit more before we tackle getting the SARE rules published as
> channels.
FWI
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 19:32 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
A channel is essentially a set of rules published by some
organization, which is accessed and downloaded via dns/http. ie:
Would that be a possible replacement for RulesDuJour? I love that
script, but not
On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 02:19 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:26:32AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > A channel is essentially a set of rules published by some
> > > organization, which is accessed and downloaded via dns/http. ie:
> >
> > Would that be a possible repl
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:26:32AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > A channel is essentially a set of rules published by some
> > organization, which is accessed and downloaded via dns/http. ie:
>
> Would that be a possible replacement for RulesDuJour? I love that
> script, but not having to i
On Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 19:32 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> A channel is essentially a set of rules published by some
> organization, which is accessed and downloaded via dns/http. ie:
Would that be a possible replacement for RulesDuJour? I love that
script, but not having to install something ext
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:43:12PM +0100, Cedric Foll wrote:
> what is "channel" in sa-updates ?
A channel is essentially a set of rules published by some organization,
which is accessed and downloaded via dns/http. ie:
sa-update checks (by default) updates.spamassassin.org to see if any updates
Hi,
what is "channel" in sa-updates ?
What are the channel available ?
Where can we found information about update rules processes included in
3.1.1 ?
BTW find for all the great work done on spamassassin !
Regards.
