Justin Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:59, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> On Friday 29 January 2010 04:20:15 René Berber wrote:
>>> Jason Bertoch wrote:
What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
>>> Now using re2c 1.3.5 same
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 10:20 PM, René Berber wrote:
>>
>> Now using re2c 13.5 same problem, to be precise it doesn't hang, it
>> loops (the CPU usage goes up and down, RSS the same, up and down) at the
>> same point.
>>
>> Here's the output http://pastebin.com/m438000e0
>>
>
> Assumi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:59, Mark Martinec wrote:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 04:20:15 René Berber wrote:
>> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>> > What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
>> > 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
>>
>> Now using re2c 1.3.5 same problem, to be precise
On Friday 29 January 2010 04:20:15 René Berber wrote:
> Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
> > 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
>
> Now using re2c 1.3.5 same problem, to be precise it doesn't hang, it
> loops (the CPU usage goes up and dow
On 1/28/2010 10:20 PM, René Berber wrote:
Now using re2c 13.5 same problem, to be precise it doesn't hang, it
loops (the CPU usage goes up and down, RSS the same, up and down) at the
same point.
Here's the output http://pastebin.com/m438000e0
Assuming you recompiled your rules after the re2c
René Berber wrote:
> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>
>> What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
>> 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
>
> Now using re2c 1.3.5 same problem, to be precise it doesn't hang, it
Oops!0.13.5
> loops (the CPU usage goes up and down, RSS
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
> 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
Now using re2c 1.3.5 same problem, to be precise it doesn't hang, it
loops (the CPU usage goes up and down, RSS the same, up and down) at the
same point.
Here's the outp
Mark Martinec wrote:
> It hasn't been determined exactly which is the minimal working version,
> the 0.12 was chosen just as a version whose predecessors are known to fail.
> Actually SpamAssassin 3.3.0 was tested with 0.13.5, which worked fine.
I'll try that version tonight.
> Not sure which is
René,
> > What version of re2c are you using? Can you post the output of
> > 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
>
> re2c is version 0.12.1. The script sa-compile checks the version so I
> don't think there's a problem there.
It hasn't been determined exactly which is the minimal working ver
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Can you post the output of 'spamassassin -D --lint' to pastebin?
Here's the current working output: http://pastebin.com/m35634489
--
René Berber
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 3:54 PM, René Berber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm having a problem with spamassassin 3.3.0 after doing sa-compile.
>>
>> The operation didn't return any error and seems to go as usual, but
>> running 'spamassassin --lint' hangs, and it didn't before using
>> sa-compi
On 1/28/2010 3:54 PM, René Berber wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with spamassassin 3.3.0 after doing sa-compile.
The operation didn't return any error and seems to go as usual, but
running 'spamassassin --lint' hangs, and it didn't before using
sa-compile (it doesn't after using the solution b
Hi,
I'm having a problem with spamassassin 3.3.0 after doing sa-compile.
The operation didn't return any error and seems to go as usual, but
running 'spamassassin --lint' hangs, and it didn't before using
sa-compile (it doesn't after using the solution below).
I know I'm not giving enough info t
13 matches
Mail list logo
