Mark Martinec wrote:

> It hasn't been determined exactly which is the minimal working version,
> the 0.12 was chosen just as a version whose predecessors are known to fail.
> Actually SpamAssassin 3.3.0 was tested with 0.13.5, which worked fine.

I'll try that version tonight.

> Not sure which is which. I'd find interesting the output of:
>   $ spamassassin -D -t <test.msg >test.log 2>&1
> 
> and if it hangs during evaluation of regexp rules, it would
> be worth trying with a newer re2c.

Sounds like a plan.  Thanks.
-- 
René Berber

Reply via email to