! :-( sometimes they are checked, sometimes they are not.
Digging it out why, i have noticed that as soon as score exceeds
required_score, SA bypasses some subtests randomly, and final scores
differs from one try to another.
This does not happen as long as required_score is not exceeded.
Any idea
Hi...
just a brief question.
i noticed that sometimes subtests are checked in a random way... weird! :-(
sometimes they are checked, sometimes they are not.
Digging it out why, i have noticed that as soon as score exceeds
required_score, SA bypasses some subtests randomly, and final
On 27 Jun 2018, at 22:17, J Doe wrote:
I went back to “man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf” and can see mention
of the shortcircuit plugin . . . is there more documentation (perhaps
in another man or perldoc), where the shortcircuit keyword is
mentioned ?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortci
On 28/06/2018 04:17, J Doe wrote:
I went back to “man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf” and can see mention of the
shortcircuit plugin . . . is there more documentation (perhaps in another man
or perldoc), where the shortcircuit keyword is mentioned ?
I'd say a good starting point would be
https://
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Daniele Duca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircuit:
> body __BODY_TEST1 . . .
> body __BODY_TEST2 . . .
> meta CUSTOM_RULE1(__BODY_TEST1 && __BODY_TEST2)
> shortcircuit CUSTOM_RULE1 spam
>
> At least that saves computin
On 27/06/2018 02:15, J Doe wrote:
Hi John,
Ok, good to know.
Is it possible with the SA grammar to have variables ? I was thinking
I’d have something like the following in my: /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
POISON_PILL = 100
Hi,
I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircu
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, J Doe wrote:
On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:13 AM, John Hardin mailto:jhar...@impsec.org>> wrote:
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up to the value
that required_score is set to. This way,
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:13 AM, John Hardin <mailto:jhar...@impsec.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that
>> will evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
>>
>> My
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, J Doe wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that will
evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to assign a score to a custom rule that will
evaluate to the value that required_score is set to.
My thinking here is that if this rule ever passes, it should not add a small
value to the score but push the score up to the value
that required_score is
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Jefferson Davis wrote:
I have recently updated to 3.2.4 - for some reason my required_score keeps
reverting to 5, basically ignoring or everriding the settings in local.cf.
Some Linux (presumed) disties have non-standard configuration
directories - but when you manually
I have recently updated to 3.2.4 - for some reason my required_score keeps
reverting to 5, basically ignoring or everriding the settings in local.cf.
The ruleset 10_default_prefs.cf has these settings, and this is where it
appears to come from. While I have commented out the offending line(s
Apologies, I meant to send this to the qmail-toaster list... :(
> -Original Message-
> From: James E. Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FW: Why can't I change value of required_score ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James E. Pratt
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:36 PM
> To: 'Yavuz Maslak'
> Subject: RE: Why can't I change value of required_score ?
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yavuz Maslak [mailto:
I use spamassassin3.2.1 and simscan1.2
My value of required_score doesn't work in
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.
I couldn't change required_score's value. The server still looks at old
value which I must have been set it.
I checked that the server reads /usr
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:20:26 +0100
Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> > Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really
> > do per-user configs.
> >
> > "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with
> > multiple users, such a
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do
> per-user configs.
>
> "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with
> multiple users, such as when there are several recipients for a single
> message, unless you can get the MTA t
David,
> I want to give users control of the required_score variable.
> I am using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
...
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
>/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} $
t; (procmail, maildrop, etc.)
If you -only- need Per-User required_score you may be able to achieve
that via a two stage process.
Run SA at your MTA level but have it -only- add a specific header with the
score value. Then in your delivery process have some kind of customized
delivery agent that would loo
Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user
configs.
"spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple
users, such as when there are several recipients for a single message, unless
you can get the MTA to split the message up into multiple
David.Sharpe wrote:
> Within postfix/master.cf I have the following lines :
>
> smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
>
>
> This pushes mail through the following lines :
>
> spamassassin unix - n n - - p
=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
Hope this is what you were after...
Thanks,
- David
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> David.Sharpe wrote:
>> Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am
>> using Postfix // SpamAssassin // a
David.Sharpe wrote:
Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am
using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis. I have read the document
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and have the tests
working OKAY. /executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref
Hi,
I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am using
Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
I have read the document http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and
have the tests working OKAY.
executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref WHERE username
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason A. Bert
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
> SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
> running on Perl version 5.8.8
> mimedefang version 2.63
> sendmail Version 8.14.0
>
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrat
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
I have been running spamassassin for over 2 years now, and suddenly, the
required score has changed. I have it set to 7.0, but it has suddenly
changed back to the default of 5.0. I only n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'll just answer the second of your questions and leave the first part
to those that know better how to diagnose ;)
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Speaking of which, is there any sort of BCC rule that pumps up the
> score if the mail is BCCed? I can see a
Greetings,
Am I correct in saying that the "proper" way to set a default
required_score is in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file?
I'm running SA 3.2.0 and I seem to be unable to change the default
required_score. I'm using spamc/spamd for processing via simscan
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Ray Anderson wrote:
> I use a required_score of 3 and so far have had zero positives (more
> than 3 years running).
>
> I have customers that also run 3 and have opted to have the server
> /discard/ the message (not quarantine, but /DISCARD/) if it is
>
I use a required_score of 3 and so far have had zero positives (more
than 3 years running).
I have customers that also run 3 and have opted to have the server
/discard/ the message (not quarantine, but /DISCARD/) if it is
identified as spam. So far none of those users have complained about
ietse
-Original Message-
From: R Lists06 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 4:45 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: required_score aggressive ??
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the
default
is 5.0 and that it is consi
R Lists06 wrote:
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the default
is 5.0 and that it is considered aggressive in various circumstances
Used to be called required_hits
When I first started using SA I was told that as an ISP going in the 4.0
range give or take a little
When looking up required_score info, as most know, it say that the default
is 5.0 and that it is considered aggressive in various circumstances
Used to be called required_hits
When I first started using SA I was told that as an ISP going in the 4.0
range give or take a little was an excellent
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spa
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
> Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
> message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spamassassin/spa
Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
message test?
I tried changing the required_score in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
but it is unsurprisingly not rescanned/reloaded between each message
that is tested. It would really be cool (not to mention
Michaux Julien wrote:
> Yes I use amavis...
>
> So it's in the amavis configuration that I have to set the
> required_score? Do you know it is?
Search amavisd.conf for "sa_tag_level". This should find all of the
score settings for amavis.
Amavis is much more flexible
Julien Michaux wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem using spamassassin. The required_score option
> doesn't work...
>
> I use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav,
> courier-imap and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with
> ker
tus: No, score=3.65 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
>tests=[DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.498, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD=2.152]
>
> It's like the required_score option is ignore...
> What happen?
That isn't a standard header (tagged_above indicates you're using some other
program
Hi everybody,I have a problem using spamassassin. The required_score option doesn't work...I
use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav, courier-imap
and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with kernel 2.6.12.I set the required_score option to 5 and when I recei
Screaming Eagle wrote:
> All,
> I have set required_score to 8.0 and restarted spamd. But new email
> coming in is showing a require of 4.5:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
> autolearn=no
> version=3.1.0
It could be in a user_pre
All,
I have set required_score to 8.0 and restarted spamd. But new email coming in is showing a require of 4.5:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=3.1.0
Marcus Sobchak wrote:
> how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a
> special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming
> mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard
> score of 5.0.
I suppose you could make a
Hi,
how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a
special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming
mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard
score of 5.0.
Thanks,
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JamesDR wrote:
> Kevin Marvin wrote:
>
>> HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is
>> what I have...
>>
>> I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user
>> preferences. When I run a test instance and pass a test message
JamesDR wrote:
Kevin Marvin wrote:
Sorry list,
Michael set me straight on allow_user_rules :-D
--
Thanks,
James
Kevin Marvin wrote:
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get read
You, sir, are a GENIUS!
That fixed it perfectly. Thank you very much! Name the brand of e-beer and
I will send it your way.
- Kevin
On 6/7/05 1:00 PM, "Michael Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin Marvin wrote:
>
>> spamd -x -q -C /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> spamd -x -q -C /etc/mail/test/ --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/test -p
Are you sure you mean -C /etc/mail/test/? Normally that would be
something like /usr/share/spamassassin, which is where all of the
default .cf/rules files are ins
Ok..
preference| value
-+
required_score | 4.0
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST | 100
required_score | 3.0
report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> preference | value
> -+---- required_score
> | 4.0 blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] score USER_IN_BLACKLIST |
> 100 requi
preference| value
-+
required_score | 4.0
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST | 100
required_score | 3.0
report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> debug: Conf::SQL: executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM
> userpref WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' OR username =
> '$GLOBAL' OR username = '%'||'architel.com' ORDER BY username ASC
If you run the query above in psql
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get read...
Here is my local.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:05:34AM -0700, Markus Hardiyanto wrote:
> Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
> spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
> to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
> 4?
Mail::SpamAssassin doesn't actually check your mail. Pleas
Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
4?
--- Markus Hardiyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup
> required_score?
> i a
can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup required_score?
i already read the manual but still don't know how to
do it.
i creating a perl script that calling
Mail::SpamAssassin to check emails is it a spam or
not.
i want that i can configure the "required_score" from
my script
58 matches
Mail list logo
