> On Jun 27, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Daniele Duca <d...@staff.spin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircuit: > body __BODY_TEST1 . . . > body __BODY_TEST2 . . . > meta CUSTOM_RULE1 (__BODY_TEST1 && __BODY_TEST2) > shortcircuit CUSTOM_RULE1 spam > > At least that saves computing power because other rules would not be > processed once a rule is shortcircuited Hi John and Daniele,
Thank you for your replies. John - I’d love to submit a patch, but Perl is not one of the languages I speak . . . but if that changes in the near future, I’ll submit one. Daniele - I like your solution in the fact that you mention processing is short-circuited - since mail that meets my rules is already satisfied, additional work by SA is not needed. I went back to “man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf” and can see mention of the shortcircuit plugin . . . is there more documentation (perhaps in another man or perldoc), where the shortcircuit keyword is mentioned ? Thanks again, - J
