On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:30:46 -0400
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> header __MANY_SENDER sender =~ /@.*@/
Trying to match email addresses with regexes is dangerous. The string:
"funny@last"@roaringpenguin.com
is a valid email address. Check the RFCs if you don't believe me.
(That being sai
On 4/9/11 10:51 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
So you could (I suppose) legitimately reject a message with multiple From:
addresses that lacks a conforming Sender: header.
__L_HAS_SNDR looks for sender(s). BUT we need a 'one sender' rule
so, a meta rule like:
meta __MANY_FROM && ! __ONE_SENDER
On 9 Apr 2011 14:29:24 -
"John Levine" wrote:
> >Anyone know of any legitimate use of multiple email addresses in a
> >from line?
> Yes. I know a few IETF people who do it. Stuff like notes to a
> working group from both chairs.
RFC 5322 does allow multiple addresses in the From: field, bu
>Anyone know of any legitimate use of multiple email addresses in a from
>line?
Yes. I know a few IETF people who do it. Stuff like notes to a working
group from both chairs.
I think I've seen the same multiple-from spam you have. It appears to
confuse Mailman, but that's not postfix's problem
Ok, I think its stupid, and don't know what the spammers are trying to
acomplish, except to hope that one of the entries is whtelisted.
But, a from header of:
From: user@domain,com, us...@domain.com, us...@domain.com.. (on to 20
users) is just plain stupid.
It SHOULD be blocked at the MTA, e
