On 4/9/11 10:51 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:

So you could (I suppose) legitimately reject a message with multiple From:
addresses that lacks a conforming Sender: header.

__L_HAS_SNDR looks for sender(s).  BUT we need a 'one sender' rule


so, a meta rule like:
meta __MANY_FROM && ! __ONE_SENDER

should do it.

sender can't have FULLNAME, only email, and can't have multiple emails.

header __MANY_SENDER sender =~ /@.*@/

header __ONE_SENDER __L_HAS_SNDR && ! __MANY_SENDER

header __MANY_FROM From:addr =~ /@.*@/


but, I can't get many 'from' to trigger: with that, but this does work.

header __MANY_FROM From =~/(?:\@[^@]{5,30}){3}/

that (from your MANY_RECIPS). anyone want to pair it down do make it less expensive?

suggest put in sandbox for a while? but, no reason it should not trigger a score of 3 or more.


(pastebin available upon request, but:

From: <be...@domain.com>,
<jkee...@domain.com>,
<s...@domain.com>,
<a...@domain.com>,
<ageda...@domain.com>



Regards,

David.


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

   * Best Intrusion Prevention Product, Networks Product Guide
   * Certified SNORT Integrator
   * Hot Company Award, World Executive Alliance
   * Best in Email Security, 2010 Network Products Guide
   * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ ______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to