RE: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
9 1:16 AM > To: RobertH > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: misc_10.cf > > RobertH wrote: > > > > > > > >> Um, that's a file that comes with SA, and it is *NOT* user editable. > >> Therefore, it's not an example, it is a standa

RE: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread RobertH
> > What is it that you don't understand in this description? > Don't you find report_template ? Did you notice that is says > "something like" ? > > Kai > kai i was only trying to find out if there was something that could benefit clients or people that email them and save our organizati

RE: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread RobertH
matus and others i hadnt ever seen that info before and was just checking to see what it was all about first of all, the info on the SA website download area is outdated. bad info. second of all, i was trying to figure out if it was talking about getting valid info to people and if it could be

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Feb-2009, at 23:02, Theo Van Dinter wrote: 10_misc.cf isn't in 3.2, 3.1 was the last version to have it. In 3.2 it's called 10_default_prefs.cf. You should have it installed in the default rules dir, probably /usr/share/spamassassin. /usr/local/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf on

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
RobertH wrote on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:09:02 -0800: > so the bottom line is that page should be edited / corrected and i am still > wanting to find the right example to make this file > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_local_report.cf > > am i chasing a ghost for no reason? > System Administrators > Pl

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.02.09 22:09, RobertH wrote: > after a few, i kinda figured that it wasnt in 3.2.x yet i was still trying > to understand why on the website and then the download link page has that > info at the bottom. because users tend to complain to authors who have no possibility of affecting servers ot

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread Matt Kettler
other files that create the default ruleset. Updated ones created by sa-update would be in /var/lib/spamassassin. You may want to template off that (see below) > i am fairly certain i hand generated and installed via rpm generated by > > rpm -tb sa-tarballname.whateveritwas.somethingsomething &

RE: misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread RobertH
> > 10_misc.cf isn't in 3.2, 3.1 was the last version to have it. > In 3.2 it's called 10_default_prefs.cf. > > You should have it installed in the default rules dir, > probably /usr/share/spamassassin. > > And no, it's not editable. Or more specifically, you > shouldn't edit it. > theo,

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
gt; using the locate command etc... > > i am fairly certain i hand generated and installed via rpm generated by > > rpm -tb sa-tarballname.whateveritwas.somethingsomething > > something like that. > > on a centos aka redhat clone > > the misc_10.cf file looks prett

RE: misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread RobertH
lled via rpm generated by rpm -tb sa-tarballname.whateveritwas.somethingsomething something like that. on a centos aka redhat clone the misc_10.cf file looks pretty editable to me in some respects. i wouldnt have even have asked if i had not gone to spamassassin.apache.org and then clicked on "downloads" and on

Re: misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread Matt Kettler
RobertH wrote: > is this the best example on the www for this file? > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/rules/10_misc.cf > > or is there one more recent for 3.2.5 or newer? > > - rh > > > Um, that's a file that comes with SA, and it is *NOT* user editable. Therefore, it's not an

misc_10.cf

2009-02-09 Thread RobertH
is this the best example on the www for this file? http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/rules/10_misc.cf or is there one more recent for 3.2.5 or newer? - rh