Le 13/12/2010 23:45, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, mouss wrote:
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
As others have said, it depends who sent it and why. Invitations sent
specifically by people who know you aren't spam, but I've heard it said
several ti
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> I don't remotely intend to go vigilante: I don't know how you got that
> from what I said, which I thought boiled down to:
>
> a) If an acquaintance asks you become a member that is not a problem.
In fact, acquaintance or otherwise, that is the whole idea :-)
> b) If a
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
>
> > As others have said, it depends who sent it and why. Invitations sent
> > specifically by people who know you aren't spam, but I've heard it said
> > several times that Facebook auto-generates inv
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 08:17 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
mouss wrote:
the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian
lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of
spam.
And whilst invitations such as those
Le 13/12/2010 11:30, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
Hello Per Jessen,
Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject them
Le 13/12/2010 15:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas w
Le 13/12/2010 11:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
Le 13/12/2010 09:0
> >> >> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> >> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
> >> >> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
> >> >> > terrorism.
> >> >
> >> > On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> >> Just reject them all?
> >
> >> Matus UHLAR - fa
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Per Jessen,
>
> Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>
>> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
>> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
>>
>> Just reject them
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> >> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> >> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
>> >> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
>> >> > terrorism.
>> >
>> > On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
>> >> Just reject them all?
>
>> Mat
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
>>>
>>> Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
>>> on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
> Le 13/12/2010 09:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
> >> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
> >> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
> >
> > On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> Just reject them all?
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Do those invitati
Hello Per Jessen,
Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
>
> Just reject them all?
Not possibel, because the ar
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 08:17 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>
> > the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian
> > lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of
> > spam.
>
> And whilst invitations such as those broadcasted are annoying, they'r
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>
>> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
>> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
>
> On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Just reject them all?
>
> Do those invitations conta
Le 13/12/2010 09:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> > as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and
>> > has valid DKIM sigs.
>>
>> Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that
>> scores on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
>
> now the question is, if
> > as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
> > valid DKIM sigs.
>
> Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
> on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is, if we know it's an linkedin invitation, if
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
> > worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
> Just reject them all?
Do those invitations contain headers by whose they could be detected
mouss wrote:
> as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
> valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
> the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian li
Le 12/12/2010 23:35, haman...@t-online.de a écrit :
Hello Greg Troxel,
Am 2010-12-12 10:51:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
isn't really spam. The prob
>>
>> Hello Greg Troxel,
>>
>> Am 2010-12-12 10:51:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> > Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
>> > these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
>> > isn't really spam. The problem appears to be that the s
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> 300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
> worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject them all?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Hello Greg Troxel,
Am 2010-12-12 10:51:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
> these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
> isn't really spam. The problem appears to be that the sites offer the
> abili
I've also been having problems with invitation spam, and have complained
to linkedin with no useful results.
Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
isn't really spam. The problem appears to be tha
25 matches
Mail list logo
