> > as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has > > valid DKIM sigs. > > Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores > on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is, if we know it's an linkedin invitation, if we need to verify DKIM at all ;) > mouss wrote: > > the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian > > lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of > > spam. On 13.12.10 08:17, Per Jessen wrote: > And whilst invitations such as those broadcasted are annoying, they're > not _really_ spam, are they? they are UBE, I'm not sure if that means spam to you... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.
