On Saturday, March 4, 2006, 6:29:27 AM, Rob McEwen wrote:
> I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
> (with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
> course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
> sub
If someone threatened me like that I'd totally block them and tell them
to bring it on.
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> and followup from me, please re*ply with NoThankYou in the subject,
> or click this self re*moval link: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =3DNoThankYoualpha
>
> W*ARNING: There will be a $500 fine PER INCIDENT
> for=
> False Sp*am accusations,
> resulting in loss of bu*siness for
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> Mouss said:
>
>
>>...or you serve other people.
>
>
> Don't mean to change the subject... but I do provide e-mail services for
> other companies... should I have something in writing from them making me
> explicitly NOT to be held liable or legally responsible for blockin
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:30:25PM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> I'm not an attorney so this isn't real legal advice but what are "False
> Sp*am accusations". Block them for being a Spammer not a Sp*ammer. I
> highly doubt that even in the remote possibility that this was opted
> into that they c
on against you.
You should really reply from that account and ask what Sp*am is.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 6:29 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: intimidation from spammer
>
>
>...
>Paul Shupak:
>
>Very nice disection/research of that spam! I learned much just from your
>message. I really appreciate the time you took if only that it helps me (and
>probably some others...) learn a bit more about how to investigate these types
>of e-mails.
>
>This thread was well worth
Paul Shupak:
Very nice disection/research of that spam! I learned much just from your
message. I really appreciate the time you took if only that it helps me (and
probably some others...) learn a bit more about how to investigate these types
of e-mails.
This thread was well worth it just of th
>I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
>(with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
>course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
>subscribed to, but most of it is spam. Therefore, this account ha
Mouss said:
>...or you serve other people.
Don't mean to change the subject... but I do provide e-mail services for
other companies... should I have something in writing from them making me
explicitly NOT to be held liable or legally responsible for blocking
messages that I deem as spam? Any sugg
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
> (with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
> course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
> subscribed to, but most of it is spam. T
Personally I'd forward it to the FTC/FBI and let them decide if this is
mabye spam.
Loren
I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
(with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
subscribed to, but most of it is spam. Therefore, this account has va
13 matches
Mail list logo
