Ray Dzek wrote:
> Just as a side note...
>
> I am a charter customer. I have spoken with their techincal assistance
> many times, and at various levels, for myself and on behalf of others I
> have tried to assist. They are by far the most incompetent ISP I have
> ever dealt with. They only have
ge. I reject everything from there right-away.
Kai
Like most ISP, charter.net will block port 25 for those _not_ on their
network. I had clients who were using my mail servers for their outgoing
mail services until early last year when Comcast, ATT, and Charter (the
ones I had to deal with
al Message-
From: Jonn R Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:30 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: charter.net
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400:
I think it's a brain-dead attempt to counter th
Jonn R Taylor wrote on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:30:22 -0500:
> What even more
> interesting is that they block 25 out going. So I am not sure why we all
> see so much spam from them.
The spam is comming from *.dhcp.*.*.charter.com. Obviously, there's no such
blockage. I reject everything from there
m: Jonn R Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:30 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: charter.net
>
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400:
> >
> >> I think it's a b
ggest spam sources for us.
Kai
Yes, That is very true. Alot of the spam that I see is from charter.net,
but I do see alot of spoofed address with there name. What even more
interesting is that they block 25 out going. So I am not sure why we all
see so much spam from them.
Jonn
Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400:
> I think it's a brain-dead attempt to counter the image and pdf
> spams that have been so popular lately.
It would be nice if they would block their outgoing spam in the same
effective way. They are among the biggest spam sources for us.
K
rejecting all messages with attachments. You
suggested blacklisting charter.net. That's not a solution given that
the system only affects charter.net users.
Regards,
-sm
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
OK, but I thought that there was something that one of the RFC's said
about rejecting mail at the smtp level?
Eh?
Also, it looks like they are rejecting mail, at the smtp level, based
on message body too.
That's fine under the RFCs. In fact, the RFC's
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
>
> OK, but I thought that there was something that one of the RFC's said
> about rejecting mail at the smtp level?
Eh?
> Also, it looks like they are rejecting mail, at the smtp level, based
> on message body too.
That's fine under the RFCs. In fact, the RFC's explicitly spec
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
Charters latest for blocking mail. They must block mail that has any
kind of attachments. We have a user that sends her self pdf's to her
home account that is hosted by charter.net. Maybe every one should
just blacklist charter and then maybe they
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
> Charters latest for blocking mail. They must block mail that has any
> kind of attachments. We have a user that sends her self pdf's to her
> home account that is hosted by charter.net. Maybe every one should
> just blacklist charter and then maybe they
Charters latest for blocking mail. They must block mail that has any
kind of attachments. We have a user that sends her self pdf's to her
home account that is hosted by charter.net. Maybe every one should just
blacklist charter and then maybe they will get the hint. Anyway, I
thought that
13 matches
Mail list logo
