I have posted the promised error-generating file for antidrug.cf to the
comcast webspace. Anyone RDJ'ing antidrug from comcast (instead of
verizon) will start getting lint errors so they will hopefully pay
attention to the new site notice in the rulefile.
For those that have missed my num
I have posted the promised error-generating file for antidrug.cf to the
comcast webspace. Anyone RDJ'ing antidrug from comcast (instead of
verizon) will start getting lint errors so they will hopefully pay
attention to the new site notice in the rulefile.
For those that have missed my num
Chris Santerre wrote:
Two sons, 4 and 6. FINALLY someone at my level to play with!! :)
And yes, they already can ice skate and play hockey.
Surely you would have RMA'd them by now if they couldn't. :)
On Wednesday September 06 2006 3:51 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:53 PM
> > To: spamassassin
> > Subject: Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
Title: RE: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
> -Original Message-
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:53 PM
> To: spamassassin
> Subject: Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
>
>
> DAve wr
-week old and a very busy job.
However, antidrug.cf by that exact name will never be updated except
when I put up the error-text.
I feel your pain on the freetime problem...
I'm trying to decide the best way to deprecate your old URL and/or
ruleset name in RDJ. Since antidrug.cf is cur
it should probably be removed from RDJ altogether.
Well, eventually I might do some updates and split antidrug into
antidrug-pre30.cf, antidrug-30x.cf, antidrug-31x.cf, etc. But my spare
time is near zero nowdays. I've got a 7-week old and a very busy job.
However, antidrug.cf by that exact
probably be removed from RDJ altogether.
Well, eventually I might do some updates and split antidrug into
antidrug-pre30.cf, antidrug-30x.cf, antidrug-31x.cf, etc. But my spare
time is near zero nowdays. I've got a 7-week old and a very busy job.
However, antidrug.cf by that exact name will nev
RDJ altogether.
Well, eventually I might do some updates and split antidrug into
antidrug-pre30.cf, antidrug-30x.cf, antidrug-31x.cf, etc. But my spare
time is near zero nowdays. I've got a 7-week old and a very busy job.
However, antidrug.cf by that exact name will never be updated except
w
rom RDJ altogether.
Well, eventually I might do some updates and split antidrug into
antidrug-pre30.cf, antidrug-30x.cf, antidrug-31x.cf, etc. But my spare
time is near zero nowdays. I've got a 7-week old and a very busy job.
However, antidrug.cf by that exact name will never be updated e
Matt Kettler wrote:
Although not yet definite, I am likely switching ISPs starting next
Friday. It is my intent to keep the Comcast account active for about 4
weeks as a fall-back if the new ISP doesn't work out.
However, this means antidrug.cf will be moving, and at some point after
I shut dow
Title: RE: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
>
> So, here's your first (of 3) warning to disable RDJ for antidrug until
> the move is completed. (If you have SA 3.0.0 or higher you
> shouldn't be
> using antidrug.cf anyway).
I still get hits to the origi
Although not yet definite, I am likely switching ISPs starting next
Friday. It is my intent to keep the Comcast account active for about 4
weeks as a fall-back if the new ISP doesn't work out.
However, this means antidrug.cf will be moving, and at some point after
I shut down the account th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sorry to ask a question I *think* I've seen the answer to, but should I
> not use SARE's antidrug.cf with SA 3.1.0? I think I remember seeing
> something about that on this list.
Antidrug.cf isn't SARE's, it's mine. (Not that I
Sorry to ask a question I *think* I've
seen the answer to, but should I not use SARE's antidrug.cf with SA 3.1.0?
I think I remember seeing something about that on this list.
Thanks!
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Chris Thielen writes:
> > Did SA 2.6x support any if* statements in rulesfiles like 3.0 does (eg:
> > ifplugin)?
>
> Chris, pretty sure it didn't.
ISTR that it tried to, but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Thielen writes:
> Did SA 2.6x support any if* statements in rulesfiles like 3.0 does (eg:
> ifplugin)?
Chris, pretty sure it didn't.
- --j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFDjzyKMJF5cimL
intervention. You could change your ruleset name from antidrug.cf to
antidrug_pre300.cf (and notify me, of course) and it wouldn't cause 404s
or any other visible errors to RDJ users. This doesn't really solve the
problem though, except that you can then reuse the antidrug.cf filenam
Renaming is quite different. If you re-name, at least your users
> will know about it because their downloads will fail.
>
> Replacing the file contents with nothing comments will generate no
> warnings, no errors, and no one will notice.
Right. So rename antidrug.cf to antidrug_p
At 08:57 AM 12/1/2005, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Doesn't RDJ have a rule renaming feature? I seem to remember getting
a message from RDJ at one point saying that one of the SARE rules had
changed names.
Renaming is quite different. If you re-name, at least your users will know
about it because thei
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> mouss wrote:
> >
> > I didn't say so but had in mind:
> > - antidrug.cf: just a notice (which also provides a link to the
> > pre30 version)
> > - a pre30 version.
>
> No way.
>
> That c
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> Ron, I understood you. What I don't understand is if that's what mouss is
>> suggesting.
>>
>> As previously said, I read mouss as suggesting I empty antidrug.cf. I
>> did not
>> read
Matt Kettler a écrit :
Ron, I understood you. What I don't understand is if that's what mouss is
suggesting.
As previously said, I read mouss as suggesting I empty antidrug.cf. I did not
read you as suggesting this.
I didn't say so but had in mind:
- antidrug.cf: just a not
erl version problems. For them, I still wish to make the file available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>How about a pre-3.0 version (last meaningful version) and post-3.0
>>>(mouss's suggestion)
>>
>>Is that mouss's suggestion? I read his m
ilable.
> > >
> > >
> >How about a pre-3.0 version (last meaningful version) and post-3.0
> >(mouss's suggestion)
>
> Is that mouss's suggestion? I read his message as suggesting that I
> wipe-out the contents of antidrug.cf and replace it with a n
ss's suggestion? I read his message as suggesting that I
wipe-out the contents of antidrug.cf and replace it with a notice.
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Yes, but there are still users out there that aren't using SA 3.0.x
> due to perl version problems. For them, I still wish to make the file
> available.
Or because we've seen no pressing reason to upgrade; 2.64 is working
Just Fine Thanks. (Not to mention a good reason NOT
Matt Kettler writes:
>
> At 09:36 PM 11/29/2005, mouss wrote:
> >it would be good to make the file empty, only containing this info. this
> >way, even those who miss this message (and the previous one) still have a
> >chance to get the info.
>
> Yes, but there are still users out there that are
At 09:36 PM 11/29/2005, mouss wrote:
it would be good to make the file empty, only containing this info. this
way, even those who miss this message (and the previous one) still have a
chance to get the info.
Yes, but there are still users out there that aren't using SA 3.0.x due to
perl versi
Matt Kettler a écrit :
Since a lot of people are still using antidrug.cf, I'm making a public
announcement here to clarify.
Antidrug.cf is deprecated and obsolete for all users of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 or
higher. These rules are now a part of the standard SA distribution, and any
improvements
Since a lot of people are still using antidrug.cf, I'm making a public
announcement here to clarify.
Antidrug.cf is deprecated and obsolete for all users of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 or
higher. These rules are now a part of the standard SA distribution, and any
improvements will likely happen dir
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
One problem with the above regex.. it will match "tablets" or "tabs" in an
un-obfuscated form.
I think that is ok in the subject.
subject with tablets even un obfuscated still deserves a score around 1
Depends what kind of tablet you're talking about.. If
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 21:34, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or
> > ta.blets in the subject.
> >
> > I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for
> > catching this kind
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
Hi list,
Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or
ta.blets in the subject.
I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for
catching this kind of subjects
/\bta+\.?b(let)?s\b/
Has someone already a ruleset fo
Hi list,
Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or
ta.blets in the subject.
I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for
catching this kind of subjects
/\bta+\.?b(let)?s\b/
Has someone already a ruleset for this
Thanks
Ram
--
sassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Antidrug.cf
>
>
>How completely rude. What are you, twelve years old?
>
>jdow wrote:
>> It seems anabolic steroids are flat out missed by
>antidrug.cf. Of course,
>> I observe the idiot Apache spam trap on the spamassassin
>l
My apologies to any twelve-year-olds on this list who have managed to
absorb more than the most fundamental principles of politeness.
snowjack wrote:
How completely rude. What are you, twelve years old?
jdow wrote:
It seems anabolic steroids are flat out missed by antidrug.cf. Of course,
I
How completely rude. What are you, twelve years old?
jdow wrote:
It seems anabolic steroids are flat out missed by antidrug.cf. Of course,
I observe the idiot Apache spam trap on the spamassassin list does catch
the message sample when I attach it. Somebody needs to apply a clue bat
to the Apache
It seems anabolic steroids are flat out missed by antidrug.cf. Of course,
I observe the idiot Apache spam trap on the spamassassin list does catch
the message sample when I attach it. Somebody needs to apply a clue bat
to the Apache mail manager to get "it" to have this and the dev li
39 matches
Mail list logo
