Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> Has anyone else gotten v6 spam?
>
> When I first configured my personal mail servers with IPv6, I wrote a
> parser for my Simscan logs, so I could graph v6 email statistics. Since
> then (~June, 2008), I've received six blatant spam messages.
>
> H
Greg Troxel wrote:
> Has anyone else gotten v6 spam?
When I first configured my personal mail servers with IPv6, I wrote a
parser for my Simscan logs, so I could graph v6 email statistics. Since
then (~June, 2008), I've received six blatant spam messages.
Here is the text representation of these
Benny Pedersen writes:
> On Mon 04 Jan 2010 04:21:02 PM CET, Greg Troxel wrote
>> http://www.lexort.com/spam/spam-ipv6-cn.txt
>
> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
> milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 03 Jan 2010
> 22:17:05 -0500 (EST)
>
> you are on ipv4, a
On Mon 04 Jan 2010 04:21:02 PM CET, Greg Troxel wrote
http://www.lexort.com/spam/spam-ipv6-cn.txt
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 03 Jan 2010
22:17:05 -0500 (EST)
you are on ipv4, any ip whitelisted or ?
--
xpoint
(I realize that 3.2.5 does not grok v6 headers, and I believe this is
fixed in 3.3, so this is more of an observation than a complaint.)
Yesterday I received spam over IPv6 (and also TLS). This is the first
one I've noticed, probably due to a compromised v6-capable machine, so I
thought it might
