Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
>> Has anyone else gotten v6 spam?
> 
> When I first configured my personal mail servers with IPv6, I wrote a
> parser for my Simscan logs, so I could graph v6 email statistics. Since
> then (~June, 2008), I've received six blatant spam messages.
> 
> Here is the text representation of these stats of one day last month
> where a v6 spam did come through:

I've had a couple of off-list enquiries, so I'll clarify:

Messages are counted at my primary MX. My secondary MX communicates via
IPv6 over the Internet to my primary. Messages sent from external
sources via IPv4 to my secondary which are subsequently sent to my
primary via IPv6 are NOT counted in the tally.

Only messages where the originating mail server was v6 enabled are counted.

...make sense? ;)

Steve


> Email by protocol stats for 2009/12/25
> 
> Total Messages:    1666
> Spam:            1125
> Ham:             541
> Spam % of Total:   67.53 %
> 
> Score Total:     23746.10
> Scored Positive:   1368
> Scored Negative:   298
> Score Avg:       14.25
> 
> Messages via IPv6: 173
> Percent of total:  10.38 %
> SPAM via IPv6:     1
> Percent of Spam:   0.09 %
> 
> Messages via IPv4: 1493
> Percent of Total:  89.62 %
> SPAM via IPv4:     1124
> Percent of Spam:   99.91 %
> 
> MTA Connections:   3242
> Accepted:        3143
> Rejected:        99
> Rejected Percent   3.05
> 
> ...unfortunately, I believe the actual message from this day has already
> been eradicated, but if there is interest, I'll start keeping them for
> comparison.
> 
> Steve

Reply via email to