Re: Update Channel

get? Paste the output, we cannot help without you > providing some actual data. sa-update -D output might me interesting, > too. > >> On 7/29/2013 12:28 AM, Blason rock wrote: >> > Does any one know a good working SA update channel from >> > wh

Re: Update Channel

ght me interesting, too. > On 7/29/2013 12:28 AM, Blason rock wrote: > > Does any one know a good working SA update channel from > > where I could download updates? Updates.spamassassin.org > > doesnt seem to be valid. What do you mean, "doesn&#

Re: Update Channel

On 7/29/2013 2:00 AM, Blason rock wrote: Then i see updates are getting failed for this channel and I dont see any successful updation entries. If rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com is your only channel failing, you'll have to hope the channel author or

Re: Update Channel

Then i see updates are getting failed for this channel and I dont see any successful updation entries. On 29 Jul 2013 10:36, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > On 7/29/2013 12:37 AM, Blason rock wrote: > > Then all my updates are failing especially to > rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com with error access

Re: Update Channel

On 7/29/2013 12:37 AM, Blason rock wrote: Then all my updates are failing especially to rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com with error access denied. I believe that is the sought rules channel which isn't a project ruleset. You'll need to discuss errors

Re: Update Channel

Then all my updates are failing especially to rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com with error access denied. On 29 Jul 2013 10:03, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > On 7/29/2013 12:28 AM, Blason rock wrote: > > Does any one know a good working SA update channel from where I could

Re: Update Channel

On 7/29/2013 12:28 AM, Blason rock wrote: Does any one know a good working SA update channel from where I could download updates? Updates.spamassassin.org <http://Updates.spamassassin.org> doesnt seem to be valid. sa-update automatically has channels defined from MIRRORED.BY for the

Update Channel

Hey Guys, Does any one know a good working SA update channel from where I could download updates? Updates.spamassassin.org doesnt seem to be valid.

Re: update channel list

On 01/18/2012 09:25 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > All of those are currently listed by Adam Katz on > http://khopesh.com/wiki/Anti-spam > I expect that list to be up to date. > He's an active spamassassin developer. All of my channels are still relevant, though the only actively (automat

Re: update channel list

On 01/19, Micah Anderson wrote: > I noticed that pyzor is recommended there. I had disabled it because it > seemed like it was no longer being developed. The second highest ranked SA rule is DIGEST_MULTIPLE, which is where an email hits both PYZOR_CHECK and RAZOR2_CHECK (or one of those and DCC_C

Re: update channel list

dar...@chaosreigns.com writes: > On 01/18, Micah Anderson wrote: >> updates.spamassassin.org >> sought.rules.yerp.org >> khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com >> khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com >> khop-general.sa.khopesh.com >> khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com >> >> but I suspect that some of these are no longer go

Re: update channel list

On 2012-01-18 18:25, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 01/18, Micah Anderson wrote: updates.spamassassin.org sought.rules.yerp.org khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com khop-general.sa.khopesh.com khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com but I suspect that some of these are no longer good.

Re: update channel list

On 01/18, Micah Anderson wrote: > updates.spamassassin.org > sought.rules.yerp.org > khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com > khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com > khop-general.sa.khopesh.com > khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com > > but I suspect that some of these are no longer good. I was hoping folks > out there might b

update channel list

I've had the following channel list for a while: updates.spamassassin.org sought.rules.yerp.org khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com khop-general.sa.khopesh.com khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com but I suspect that some of these are no longer good. I was hoping folks out there might

Re: sa-update channel list

No wonder, the version I had Jan 15 09:39:29.620 [6248] dbg: dns: 0.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 3.4 1230922, parsed as 3 Jan 15 09:39:29.620 [6248] dbg: channel: current version is 1195375, new version is 3, skipping channel Now after updating from SVN it gives Jan 15 09:45:34.588 [15283] dbg

Re: sa-update channel list

On 1/11/12 10:09 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes: All I know is I'm using Jan 12 11:07:09.394 [21138] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0-r1102360 which is obviously newer than 3.3.2. they whoever built that unreleased development version for you broke so

Re: sa-update channel list

x27;t spit out the date. MS> I meant your version of spamassassin. MS> 3.3.2 was updated yesterday. MS> if you don't have the current version of spamassassin then your sa-update channel will be older. (case in point) All I know is I'm using Jan 12 11:07:09.394 [21138] dbg: ge

Re: sa-update channel list

On 01/12, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes: > MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated > Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24. > Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date. I don't remember what that update was for,

Re: sa-update channel list

if you don't have the current version of spamassassin then your sa-update channel will be older. (case in point) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Pr

Re: sa-update channel list

> "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes: MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24. Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.

Re: sa-update channel list

t, maintainer of the FreeBSD version of sa, and running one of the mirrors: We use stock sa-update channel, and (local) custom rules, lots of meta rules. #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated, because new(er) rules and tests are only added, or are added first to current/stable ver

sa-update channel list

Hello, I'm using SpamAssassin for years now to get rid of spam. Now I wonder which sa-update channels you're using by default to improve your scan results. Are you sticking to the default 'updates.spamassassin.org' channel only or would you recommend to use other channels too. Unfortunately the SAR

[Solved] Re: sa-update channel problem

ks everybody for your help. Regards, Marco -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-problem-tp27587078p27600668.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel problem

Mbeis wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:04:35 -0800 (PST): > What can I change in it to > make DNS work for spamassassin? how should we know? Maybe it's not doing TXT field lookups or a server in the chain doesn't do them or a firewall doesn't like that. It's best you talk to your service provider a

Re: sa-update channel problem

> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > > >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: > >> ;mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT > >> > >> ;; Query time: 1 msec > >> ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.138#53(10.0.0.138) > > > > Maybe want to go see that server? ;) On 15.02.10 07:04, mbeis wrote: > This is the IP adress of my D

Re: sa-update channel problem

After installing the tarball manually, spamd now starts. Leaves figuring out what is wrong with my DNS. But it's nice to have SpamAssassin working again. Thanks for all your help! Regards, Marco -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-pr

Re: sa-update channel problem

of my DSL router. I haven't touched it for a decade or so and I have never had a DNS problem before. What can I change in it to make DNS work for spamassassin? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-problem-tp27587078p27595138.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 06:30 -0800, mbeis wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Once again, there is no IP for these, and it isn't supposed to have one. > > > > You are missing the TXT type in your query. By default, dig performs a a > > lookup for an A record. > > dig -t TXT mirrors.updates.sp

Re: sa-update channel problem

: NOERROR, id: 39274 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT ;; Query time: 1 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.138#53(10.0.0.138) ;; WHEN: Mon Feb 15 15:29:07 2010 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 50 -- View this message in con

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 05:45 -0800, mbeis wrote: > When I enter dig 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org, I get: Once again, there is no IP for these, and it isn't supposed to have one. You are missing the TXT type in your query. By default, dig performs a a lookup for an A record. -- char *t="\10pse

Re: sa-update channel problem

; Query time: 182 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.138#53(10.0.0.138) ;; WHEN: Mon Feb 15 14:42:49 2010 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 123 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-problem-tp27587078p27593997.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 13:34 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > dig +short -t TXT 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org That gets "903765" from here. Martin

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 10:38 +, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 23:46 -0800, mbeis wrote: > > John Hardin wrote: > > > What does "dig +short -t TXT 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org" return? > > > > I have this computer running like this for 6 years now, and I've never had a > > pr

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 23:46 -0800, mbeis wrote: > > John Hardin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, mbeis wrote: > > > >> Feb 14 22:12:46.522 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: > >> 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NOERROR > >> Feb 14 22:12:46.525 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: > >> mirrors.updat

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:46, mbeis wrote: > > > John Hardin wrote: >> >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, mbeis wrote: >> >>> Feb 14 22:12:46.522 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: >>> 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NOERROR >>> Feb 14 22:12:46.525 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: >>> mirrors.updates.spamassa

Re: sa-update channel problem

is before. When I enter the command it returns nothing, doesn't seem ok to me? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-problem-tp27587078p27590396.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel problem

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, mbeis wrote: Feb 14 22:12:46.522 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: 0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NOERROR Feb 14 22:12:46.525 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed: mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org => NOERROR channel: no 'mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org' record found, channel fai

Re: sa-update channel problem

Mbeis wrote on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:19:44 -0800 (PST): > It seems that I have to run sa-update first in order for SA to work. But > sa-update exits with an error too, sa-update -D gives: I think I have seen a few messages over this weekend about update problems. There must have been/be some serve

sa-update channel problem

re to look to solve this. Has anyone here have an idea what causes this? Thanks, Marco -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-problem-tp27587078p27587078.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel detail

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Sure it does. Any output from the program will be emailed. Cron > doesn't care if it's error output, update notifications, or just random > garbage. I am used to having a funnel of root email going to me as the root administrator but having other subsystem messages go to ot

RE: sa-update channel detail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I don't want to add any email capabilities to the program. I think > > that's going a bit outside the scope of what the program should be > > responsible for. > > I was not thinking of adding email to the program. But what if it > never said any

Re: sa-update channel detail

fwiw: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5043 Also, patches welcome. :) On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:06:45AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I don't want to add any email capabilities to the program. I think > > that's going a bit outside the scope of what

Re: sa-update channel detail

Bowie Bailey wrote: > I don't want to add any email capabilities to the program. I think > that's going a bit outside the scope of what the program should be > responsible for. I was not thinking of adding email to the program. But what if it never said anything unless there was an error or an u

RE: sa-update channel detail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I'm not looking for massive amounts of output. I want either no > > output or a list of updated channels. > > I personally would prefer some type of simple email report when rules > were updated. Sure I can script something up myself. But it wo

RE: sa-update channel detail

Henrik Krohns wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:11:09PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Matthias Haegele wrote: > > > Bowie Bailey schrieb: > > > > Is there any way to get sa-update to output detail about which > > > > channels were updated? I currently get an email when it updates > > > > someth

Re: sa-update channel detail

Bowie Bailey wrote: > I'm not looking for massive amounts of output. I want either no output > or a list of updated channels. I personally would prefer some type of simple email report when rules were updated. Sure I can script something up myself. But it would be a nice addition to the command

RE: sa-update channel detail

Matthias Haegele wrote: > Bowie Bailey schrieb: > > Is there any way to get sa-update to output detail about which > > channels were updated? I currently get an email when it updates > > something, but I can't tell which channels were updated without > > digging into the directory structure lookin

Re: sa-update channel detail

Bowie Bailey schrieb: Is there any way to get sa-update to output detail about which channels were updated? I currently get an email when it updates something, but I can't tell which channels were updated without digging into the directory structure looking for timestamps. man sa-update? sa-u

sa-update channel detail

Is there any way to get sa-update to output detail about which channels were updated? I currently get an email when it updates something, but I can't tell which channels were updated without digging into the directory structure looking for timestamps. -- Bowie

Re: sa-update channel file

info man spamassassin (at: Configuration Files) > >> TIA >> >> Diptanjan > > > -- > Grüsse/Greetings > MH > > > Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-file-tf3939376.html#a11188156 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update channel file

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:16:22AM -0700, diptanjan wrote: > My question is, I am using update.spamassassin.org as well as other sources > to update my rules. > Is it possible default rules from update.spamassassin.org and other rules > can conflict at any point. It depends what you mean by "con

Re: sa-update channel file

diptanjan schrieb: Hi Friends, Hi! My question is, I am using update.spamassassin.org as well as other sources to update my rules. Is it possible default rules from update.spamassassin.org and other rules can conflict at any point. May be same rules set up in both places but scored differen

sa-update channel file

... then what? Is it ok if I remove all other sources and only depend on update.spamassassin.org to update my rules? TIA Diptanjan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-channel-file-tf3939376.html#a11173013 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at

Abusive use of SARE sa-update channel resources

Howdy folks, Just a friendly reminder that the *.sare.sa-update.dostech.net channels that I provide [1], for free, are intended for use with SpamAssassin's sa-update and not any half baked home brew solutions. sa-update uses a light-weight method (that utilizes DNS) to determine when updates

Undefined dependency when using OpenProtect sa-update channel?

As subject really, running 3.1.7 with latest spamassassin rules via sa-update, when I subscribe/download the channel at saupdates.openprotect.com and lint (which sa-update appears to do in debug mode) I get: [20029] info: rules: meta test __SARE_HEAD_FALSE has undefined dependency '__FROM_AOL_COM'