RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 December 2006 16:07 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:15:16AM -, Sujit Choudhury wrote: > sa-update puts the files into /var/lib directory. However, spamassassin -D --lint sh

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:15:16AM -, Sujit Choudhury wrote: > sa-update puts the files into /var/lib directory. However, spamassassin -D > --lint shows the files are read from /var/lib directory where as spamd > program in actual fact points to /usr/share/spamassassin. What do you mean by

RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

r* ;) Thanks ... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamd-and-Spamassassin-filtering-differently-tf2781676.html#a7771363 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

spamd. What do you mean by this? Sujit From: Neo23x0 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 08/12/2006 20:30 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote: > > First, don't do

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

ual parts and > no > Subject: text > > Where is the difference? What config files uses spamd? Is it that param? > -V, --virtual-config=dir Enable Virtual configs (needs -x) > --virtual-config-dir=dir Enable pattern

RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

Forth, the .cf's are off of /var if you use sa-update Dan -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:14 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:03:17PM -0800, Neo23x0 wrote: > Ok, but my question is still unanswered. I have a lot of really nice *.cf > files in my /usr/share/spamassassin directory, but it seems that spamd > doesn't use them. Why? Which conf-Files uses spamd? Where is the hack. > I can't find anyt

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

25_uribl.cf triplets.txt > 20_porn.cf 30_text_de.cfuser_prefs.template > 20_ratware.cf 30_text_fr.cf > 20_uri_tests.cf 30_text_it.cf > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamd-and-Spamassassin-filtering-differently-tf2781676.html#a7764285 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:49:20AM -0800, Neo23x0 wrote: > /etc/sysconfig/spamd wrote: > > SPAMD_ARGS="-d -c -a -L" > > How do I configure "spamd" to use the Rule Set, that are used by invoking > "spamassassin"? Run it the same way. ;) The first thing is removing the -L which disables network t

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

/etc/sysconfig/spamd wrote: > > SPAMD_ARGS="-d -c -a -L" > Spamassassin is uptodate. -> SpamAssassin version 3.1.7; running on Perl version 5.8.3 -> SpamAssassin Client version 3.1.7 How do I configure "spamd" to use the Rule Set, that are used by invoking "spamassa

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

Neo23x0 wrote: Spamd and Spamassassin are filtering in a different way. Why? As you can see, the results of the two tests are different, although it's the same email. Where is the difference? I tried spamassassin --lint and /etc/init.d/spamd restart, but nothing worked. spamc -c < mail.txt 3.

Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

s.com] 3.6 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist [URIs: ingreats.com] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamd-and-Spamassassin-filtering-differently-tf2781676.html#a7760846 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list