Spamd and Spamassassin are filtering in a different way. Why?
As you can see, the results of the two tests are different, although it's
the same email.
Where is the difference?
I tried spamassassin --lint and /etc/init.d/spamd restart, but nothing
worked.
spamc -c < mail.txt
3.6/5.0
spamassassin < mail.txt
Content analysis details: (21.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.6 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
1.5 FROM_BLANK_NAME From: contains empty name
1.9 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more after Received: date
10 NASTY_STOCKS BODY: Nasty stock mails
0.1 BAD_CREDIT BODY: Eliminate Bad Credit
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[210.72.20.249 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: ingreats.com]
3.6 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: ingreats.com]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamd-and-Spamassassin-filtering-differently-tf2781676.html#a7760846
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
