On 5/23/24 5:39 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2024-05-23 at 03:40:48 UTC-0400 (Thu, 23 May 2024 09:40:48 +0200)
Carsten
is rumored to have said:
Hi @all,
I want to create a SpamAssassin rule that checks if the subject line of an email contains the local
part of the recipient's email address
multiple groups within the same
rules like this?
header __TZ_CAP_TO_ADDR To:addr =~
/(?)\@(?)/
Jimmy
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 2:40 PM Carsten wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
> I want to create a SpamAssassin rule that checks if the subject line of an
> email contains t
On 2024-05-23 at 03:40:48 UTC-0400 (Thu, 23 May 2024 09:40:48 +0200)
Carsten
is rumored to have said:
Hi @all,
I want to create a SpamAssassin rule that checks if the subject line
of an email contains the local part of the recipient's email address
(the part before the @ symbol)
Hi @all,
I want to create a SpamAssassin rule that checks if the subject line of
an email contains the local part of the recipient's email address (the
part before the @ symbol). For example, if the recipient's email address
is |i...@example.com|, I want to check if the subject co
On 17.11.23 11:19, natan wrote:
E-mail was signed DKIM but why SA set "DMARC_REJECT" in this time ?
W dniu 17.11.2023 o 12:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
it's hard to see this without envelope and header from:
On 17.11.23 12:42, natan wrote:
Return-Path:
<3jtxxzrapacwkwuumvba-vwzmxtglw
natan skrev den 2023-11-17 11:19:
How it realy realy works in SA ? I ask beacuse warking not so cool:
On 17.11.23 14:21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
its a hack, and bad example on expect it hits unaligned mail aswell as
aligned, we screwed there :)
generally it could work, but it could be the reas
Hi
I had spamassassin-4.x dor ~1 day ;) And I had to downgrade to
spamassasin-3.4.6
The Problem was in /var/lib/amavis/tmp/ where content of the catalog
grow and grow
more was rising than falling like 29 GB and more
When dowgrade to stable spamassassin-3.4.6 problem fixed and size is ~100MB
natan skrev den 2023-11-17 11:19:
How it realy realy works in SA ? I ask beacuse warking not so cool:
its a hack, and bad example on expect it hits unaligned mail aswell as
aligned, we screwed there :)
good news dmarc plugin in sa trunc does aswell work in spamasasssin
3.4.6 last time i try
W dniu 17.11.2023 o 12:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 17.11.23 11:19, natan wrote:
How it realy realy works in SA ? I ask beacuse warking not so cool:
example:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_NONE _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_ TXT
/^v=DMARC1;.*\bp=none;/
askdns
On 17.11.23 11:19, natan wrote:
How it realy realy works in SA ? I ask beacuse warking not so cool:
example:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_NONE _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=DMARC1;.*\bp=none;/
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_QUAR _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_ TXT
/^v=DMARC1;
HI
How it realy realy works in SA ? I ask beacuse warking not so cool:
example:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_NONE _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=DMARC1;.*\bp=none;/
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_QUAR _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_ TXT
/^v=DMARC1;.*\bp=quarantine;/
askdns __DM
19 at 11:51:12AM +0530, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have multiple domains which are running after Spamassassin server.
I want to bypass one specific Spamassassin rule ie TextCat(Unwanted
Language) for one recipient domain.
Can someone please help me in achieving this requirement.
Regards,
Siddhesh
ve multiple domains which are running after Spamassassin server.
>
> I want to bypass one specific Spamassassin rule ie TextCat(Unwanted
> Language) for one recipient domain.
>
> Can someone please help me in achieving this requirement.
>
> Regards,
> Siddhesh
On 15.11.19 11:51, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
I have multiple domains which are running after Spamassassin server.
I want to bypass one specific Spamassassin rule ie TextCat(Unwanted
Language) for one recipient domain.
how do you run spamassassin? with spamass-milter you can use per-recipient
On 11/15/2019 1:21 AM, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have multiple domains which are running after Spamassassin server.
>
> I want to bypass one specific Spamassassin rule ie TextCat(Unwanted
> Language) for one recipient domain.
>
> Can someone please h
Hi Folks,
I have multiple domains which are running after Spamassassin server.
I want to bypass one specific Spamassassin rule ie TextCat(Unwanted
Language) for one recipient domain.
Can someone please help me in achieving this requirement.
Regards,
Siddhesh
Hi Siddhesh,
You can do this with a simple URI rule type or the Header rule type.
There are also RBLs you might consider supporting/using that can list
the domain for you as well.
header __TO_EXAMPLE To =~ /\@domain\.tld/i
and uri __URI_EXAMPLE /domain\.tld/i
Regards
Hi,
Can we assign a high score to mail which has an URL which contents a
recipient domain name or recipient email ID ?
I have been seeing lots of cases of Phish URL where spammer tries to
pull end user's password by sending these URLs over mail.
Regards,
Siddhesh
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 05:10 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2019, at 07:24, Savvas Karagiannidis
> wrote:
> > you use a perl script like this:
>
> That’s useful enough it should be part of the SA install.
>
Agreed. Savvas Karagiannidis did a good job. I've found his script
useful enough to hav
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:10:17AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2019, at 07:24, Savvas Karagiannidis wrote:
> > you use a perl script like this:
>
> That???s useful enough it should be part of the SA install.
Feel free to describe how it should work. Keep in mind there's no guarantee
that
On 24 Oct 2019, at 07:24, Savvas Karagiannidis wrote:
> you use a perl script like this:
That’s useful enough it should be part of the SA install.
--
No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got
there first, and is waiting for it.
Out of interest, why do you want this?
What are you hoping to gain?
Regards
Brent
On 2019/10/24 14:56, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Hi Folks,
Can someone please help me in retrieving a list of present rules of
Spamassassin.
Spamassassin --lint or -D option I tried but not getting expected output.
Hi,
you use a perl script like this:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Mail::SpamAssassin;
my $sa_instance = Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
$sa_instance->compile_now(0);
my %scores;
for (my $i=0; $i < 4; $i++) {
my $scoreset = $sa_instance->{'conf'}->{scoreset}[$i];
while (my ($key,$val
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 06:26:13PM +0530, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can someone please help me in retrieving a list of present rules of
> Spamassassin.
>
> Spamassassin --lint or -D option I tried but not getting expected output.
Sorry there is no command.
You can find all rule fil
Hi Folks,
Can someone please help me in retrieving a list of present rules of
Spamassassin.
Spamassassin --lint or -D option I tried but not getting expected output.
Regards,
Siddhesh
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:27 AM, francis picabia
wrote:
> I've tested the rule:
>
> uri URI_MYDOMAIN_PHISH
> m;^https?://(?:[^./]+\.)*example\.com[^/?];i
>
>
> is catching this sample newletter link:
>
> Oct 29 09:38:50.368 [24608] dbg: rules: ran uri rule
> URI_MYDOMAIN_PHISH ==> got hi
I've tested the rule:
uri URI_MYDOMAIN_PHISH
m;^https?://(?:[^./]+\.)*example\.com[^/?];i
is catching this sample newletter link:
Oct 29 09:38:50.368 [24608] dbg: rules: ran uri rule
URI_MYDOMAIN_PHISH ==> got hit: "http://example.com&";
Complete email body content in test of newslette
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, francis picabia
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, francis picabia wrote:
>>
>>uri URI_EXAMPLE_EXTRA m;^https?://(?:www\.)?example\.com[^/?];i
>>
>
>>> However another spoofed message was rece
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, francis picabia wrote:
>
>uri URI_EXAMPLE_EXTRA m;^https?://(?:www\.)?example\.com[^/?];i
>
>> However another spoofed message was received today and the rule
>> did not capture it.
>>
>> If I want to detect
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, francis picabia wrote:
uri URI_EXAMPLE_EXTRA m;^https?://(?:www\.)?example\.com[^/?];i
However another spoofed message was received today and the rule
did not capture it.
If I want to detect something in the form of:
random_server.example.com.junk
I need to wildcard t
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, francis picabia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:27 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, francis picabia wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
We just received the most authentic looking phishing I've se
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:27 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, francis picabia wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> We just received the most authentic looking phishing I've seen. It was
>> professionally written, included a nice signature in the style used by
>> people at my workplace, and the t
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, francis picabia wrote:
Hello,
We just received the most authentic looking phishing I've seen. It was
professionally written, included a nice signature in the style used by
people at my workplace, and the target link was an exact replica of an
ezproxy website we run.
Th
Hello,
We just received the most authentic looking phishing I've seen.
It was professionally written, included a nice signature in the style
used by people at my workplace, and the target link was an exact
replica of an ezproxy website we run.
The URL domain was only different by a few letters.
>On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
>>Also, in the maillog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
>>tests, but the scores of each.
On Sunday 27 April 2014 at 19:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
On 27.04.14 19:10, Antony Stone wrote:
Doesn't this
On Sunday 27 April 2014 at 19:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
> >>Also, in the maillog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
> >>tests, but the scores of each.
>
> I believe that
>
> add_header all Report _REPORT_
>
> in your user_prefs doe
On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
Also, in the mailllog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
tests, but the scores of each. At present we get just:
spamd[7403]: spamd: result: Y 4 -
DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
scantime=2.8,size=60575
On 4/24/2014 2:14 PM, Axb wrote:
IMO this should be configurable as it could break stats/loggers/etc
The change right now just adds additional API functions. Nothing uses
them.
spamd could be configured to use them and should be a configuration
option, I agree.
On 04/24/2014 07:44 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/24/2014 1:34 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:28:56 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
Keeping more in the like and kind with the existing code in PMS,
wouldn't this be closer to what you need? Completely untested but
passed t
On 4/24/2014 1:34 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:28:56 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
Keeping more in the like and kind with the existing code in PMS,
wouldn't this be closer to what you need? Completely untested but
passed tests.
Sure... I'm not picky about how it's imple
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:28:56 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> Keeping more in the like and kind with the existing code in PMS,
> wouldn't this be closer to what you need? Completely untested but
> passed tests.
Sure... I'm not picky about how it's implemented. ;) Just so long as
there's an
On 4/24/2014 11:04 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
We integrate with SpamAssassin at the Perl library level, and we reach
into the innards to get at the test scores. Here's our code:
my $conf = $sa_status->{conf} || {};
my $scores = $conf->{scores} || {};
my $testnames = join(
On 4/24/2014 11:37 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:30:
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone to step forward and implement it and I don't think
enough will care.
replyed private
lots of idears, no coders :(
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:30:
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone to step forward and implement it and I don't think
enough will care.
replyed private
lots of idears, no coders :(
On 4/24/2014 11:28 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:12:
Sounds like overkill without enough demand, personally...
only thing i see here is that you writed to me personally
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:12:
Sounds like overkill without enough demand, personally...
only thing i see here is that you writed to me personally
On 4/24/2014 11:06 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 16:50:
Always love people submitting
patches!
or opensource with think like:
make syslog plugin, make it basicly same options as in add_header just
for sysloging
then each admin can make there own login form
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 16:50:
Always love people submitting
patches!
or opensource with think like:
make syslog plugin, make it basicly same options as in add_header just
for sysloging
then each admin can make there own login format based on same tags as in
add_header
i wo
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:50:25 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> I don't believe that functionality exists. Feel free to submit a
> patch to add the option, etc. though. Always love people submitting
> patches!
We integrate with SpamAssassin at the Perl library level, and we reach
into the innar
On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
Best way is to view the applicable 50_scores.cf directly, i.e.
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf for
3.4.0 in the default location.
Also, in
On 04/24/2014 02:00 PM, emailitis.com wrote:
Thank you very much Antony, I had been looking at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests.html before which is where the "Tests"
menu goes to from the page you gave me of
https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html. I'm not yet mad which is
reassu
emailitis.com skrev den 2014-04-24 14:00:
Can anyone help with how to get scores showing in the maillog as well?
this needs a patch to spamassassin to support syslog
but spampd does what you want
note not spamc/spamd
w to get scores showing in the maillog as well?
Kind Regards,
Christoph
-Original Message-
From: Antony Stone [mailto:antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it]
Sent: 24 April 2014 11:27
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassin Rule Scores
On Thursday 24 Apri
On Thursday 24 April 2014 at 11:12, emailitis.com wrote:
> Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html
Antony
--
I want to build a machine that will be proud of me.
- Danny Hillis, creator of The Connection Mach
Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
Also, in the mailllog, I would like to see spamd show not just the tests,
but the scores of each. At present we get just:
spamd[7403]: spamd: result: Y 4 -
DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
rawbody BLOCK_RULE2 /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
Some good suggestions here already. While your original regexp should
have worked in most cases, the optimal regexp for this situation is:
/\borange\b/i
And probably body, not rawbody. Rawbody won't match if the spammer
obfuscates words with
On 4/17/2012 8:03 AM, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
> Hi.. guys
>
> i have following rule in place in spamassassin,
>
> rawbody BLOCK_RULE2 /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
> score BLOCK_RULE2 50
> describe BLOCK_RULE2 Bad Word
>
> but one of my mails got blocked even-though its doesn't have word
> "Orange" ,
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:18 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> > /\borange\b/i is what I'd use.
> >
>
I should have added that the latest versions of grep understand Perl
regex syntax, which can be useful for rapidly checking regexes before
writing an SA rule. The main difference is that the regex shoul
On 17/04/2012 15:15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 14:39 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Indeed, and /^Orange$/i will only match Orange if it is the entire line.
In fact, as SA converts each paragraph into one long line in body rules,
it will only match a paragraph containing just the w
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 14:39 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 14:18, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
> > Hi.. guys..
> >
> > I don't think regex is the issue , i tested the /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
> > its correctly doing the exact word match
> >
> >
> > Thank You
> > Dhanushka
> >
>
> Firstly,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:39:41 +0200
Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 14:18, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
> > Hi.. guys..
> >
> > I don't think regex is the issue , i tested
> > the /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i its correctly doing the exact word match
> >
> >
> > Thank You
> > Dhanushka
> >
>
> Firstly,
On 17/04/2012 14:18, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
Hi.. guys..
I don't think regex is the issue , i tested the /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
its correctly doing the exact word match
Thank You
Dhanushka
Firstly, please do not "top post"
Secondly, I disagree with you completely.
The ^ (carat) ind
Try testing below rules, if you are trying to flag the mails containing the
exact 'orange' word only and not other such as orangecat.
Rest will depend upon requirement.
Thanks,
Swati
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:48 PM, dhanushka ranasinghe <
parakrama1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.. guys..
>
> I don'
Hi.. guys..
I don't think regex is the issue , i tested the /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
its correctly doing the exact word match
Thank You
Dhanushka
On 17 April 2012 17:44, Swati R wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Tom Kinghorn
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/04/2012 14:03, dhanushka ranasinghe wr
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 14:03, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
>
>>
>> Any idea why this is happening ?
>>
>> Thank You
>> Dhanushka
>>
>>
> Try
>
> /^Orange$/i
>
> The $ specifies end of the word.
>
> Regards
> Tom
>
I think, this should work :
/\bOrang
On 17/04/2012 14:03, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
Any idea why this is happening ?
Thank You
Dhanushka
Try
/^Orange$/i
The $ specifies end of the word.
Regards
Tom
Hi.. guys
i have following rule in place in spamassassin,
rawbody BLOCK_RULE2 /(\W|^)Orange(\W|^)/i
score BLOCK_RULE2 50
describe BLOCK_RULE2 Bad Word
but one of my mails got blocked even-though its doesn't have word
"Orange" , but when search via the mail spamassassin show mail has
word Orang
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:29:13 +0200, Geert Haustraete wrote:
I'm running 2 mail servers where one is a backup server in case the
primary is unreachable. Both are set to include the SPF result in the
mail header. I have put these rules into my local.cf file.
(snip-rules)
perldoc Mail::SpamAssa
On 16.08.11 18:29, Geert Haustraete wrote:
I'm running 2 mail servers where one is a backup server in case the
primary is unreachable. Both are set to include the SPF result in the
mail header. I have put these rules into my local.cf file.
#Check for SPF headers
header LOCAL_SPF_PASS Received
Hello,
I'm running 2 mail servers where one is a backup server in case the
primary is unreachable. Both are set to include the SPF result in the
mail header. I have put these rules into my local.cf file.
#Check for SPF headers
header LOCAL_SPF_PASS Received-SPF =~ /^pass/
header LOCAL_SPF_NE
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 13:52 +0100 RW
wrote:
2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
section. Some email client will display such attachments.
That, and a SpamAssassin bug/feature, that it scans on
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:20:43 +
Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
>
> 2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
section. Some email client will display s
Hi,
My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
2.8 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different freemails
I am unable to get a suitable explanation for these rules.
Please help
Thanks
Ashish
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/21/10 3:25 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
I have the latest version of spamassassin, I am unable to find the
logic behind the following rule and it's high spam score.
MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT 3.099
Can anybody give a reason?
72_sc
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/21/10 3:25 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have the latest version of spamassassin, I am unable to find the
>> logic behind the following rule and it's high spam score.
>>
>> MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT 3.099
>>
>>
>> Can anybody give a reason?
>>
>>
> grep MANY_S
On 6/21/10 3:25 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have the latest version of spamassassin, I am unable to find the logic behind
the following rule and it's high spam score.
MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT 3.099
as for the scoring, it is done autoomaticallay, checking how much 'ham'
has more than 4 jlkj
On 6/21/10 3:25 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have the latest version of spamassassin, I am unable to find the logic behind
the following rule and it's high spam score.
MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT 3.099
Can anybody give a reason?
grep MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT *
72_active.cf:##{ MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT
72_a
Hi,
I have the latest version of spamassassin, I am unable to find the logic behind
the following rule and it's high spam score.
MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT 3.099
Can anybody give a reason?
Thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:36:05PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> You'll have to use To:raw =~ to prevent the extra whitespace from
> being removed and even that might not work. I think we fixed it so that
> it does though.
Thank you every body that replied. To:raw =~ was the fix that
Bryan K. Walton wrote:
I'm running SA 3.2.0 and am trying to write a custom spamassassin rule
to deal with some recent spam I've been seeing that has 10 additional
spaces in the "To:" header. For example:
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, I would like to writ
Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> I'm running SA 3.2.0 and am trying to write a custom spamassassin rule
> to deal with some recent spam I've been seeing that has 10 additional
> spaces in the "To:" header. For example:
>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
I'm running SA 3.2.0 and am trying to write a custom spamassassin rule
to deal with some recent spam I've been seeing that has 10 additional
spaces in the "To:" header. For example:
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, I would like to write a rule that looks for at l
SpamAssassin rule developers might be interested in this post over at my
blog:
> So far, most SpamAssassin text rules are manually developed; somebody
> looks at a few spam samples, spots common phrases, and writes a rule to
> match that. It'd be great to automate more of that w
83 matches
Mail list logo
