[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> Recently, I've upgraded to spamassassin 3.2.0 called from amavisd-new.
> I've seen that this version is more agressive, and for example it
> detect as spam
> a legitimate email with next score:
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, scor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gurus,
Recently, I've upgraded to spamassassin 3.2.0 called from amavisd-new.
I've seen that this version is more agressive, and for example it
detect as spam
a legitimate email with next score:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.884 tagged_above=-999 re
Hi gurus,
Recently, I've upgraded to spamassassin 3.2.0 called from amavisd-new.
I've seen that this version is more agressive, and for example it detect
as spam
a legitimate email with next score:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.884 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5
tests=[MIME_BASE64_
d for spamassassin 3.2.0 or 3.2.1
When we ran 3.1.8 our mail server processors reported average 25%
activity. But after upgrading spamassassin to 3.2.0 and then 3.2.1, the
servers were running nearly 100% of capacity and folks are complaining
about mail delays. The volume of incoming mail is about con
When we ran 3.1.8 our mail server processors reported average 25%
activity. But after upgrading spamassassin to 3.2.0 and then 3.2.1, the
servers were running nearly 100% of capacity and folks are complaining
about mail delays. The volume of incoming mail is about constant. We've
backed off to
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
James Lay wrote:
Hey all!
Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
* ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is
installed, but we need version >= 0.002001
ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the
versions
of the
aders for
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to install.
- Original Message -
From: Ming Hou
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0
Thank all of your replies.
I did try the following option:
perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/loc
Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0
Thank all of your replies.
I did try the following option:
perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include'
LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto'
The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal?
Thanks.
ming
Ro
Ming Hou wrote:
Thank all of your replies.
I did try the following option:
perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include'
LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto'
The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal?
Thanks.
ming
After fighting with many problems with this
Thank all of your replies.
I did try the following option:
perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include'
LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto'
The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal?
Thanks.
ming
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailt
> From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote:
>
> > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required
> Crypt::OpenSSL::Random
> > and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to
> be
> > built successfully because
Ming Hou,
> > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required
> > Crypt::OpenSSL::Random and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get
> > Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be built successfully because it always
> > complained the following messages:
>
> Edit Makefile.PL and add -lssl and -lcrypto
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote:
> My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required Crypt::OpenSSL::Random
> and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be
> built successfully because it always complained the following messages:
>
> Note (probably harmless):
Hi,
I just realized there are big changes in Spamassassin 3.2.0 that is
required several perl modules, like:
Mail::DKIM
Mail::DomainKeys
Encode::Detect
My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get
Crypt::OpenSSL
On Friday 04 May 2007 15:20, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> >Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
> >and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
> >please use it!
Duane Hill wrote:
> 2) In the Makefile, it states sa-compile doesn't work on FreeBSD and
> Solaris if you elect to use it and try doing a 'make' from the port
> directory.
Can anyone tell me what is supposed to be broken on Solaris concerning
sa-compile?
I built SA 3.2.0 using the package from
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
If you want a test,
cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
rm -rf
get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
line in v320.pre
Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compil
If you want a test,
cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
rm -rf
get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
line in v320.pre
Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compiled rule in
rule_500) but it does seem to work.
looks like I found the problematic file:
70_imageinfo.cf
was in /etc/mail/spamassassin
-Original Message-
From: Julian Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 5:08 PM
To: Duane Hill
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
Has anyone contacted the FreeBSD ports maintainer for re2c to update to
0.12.0?
On 5/8
onday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
>> To: Duane Hill
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>>
>
>> really? news to me ;)
>
> Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on freebsd (since it requires version
> .12 o
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
To: Duane Hill
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
really? news to me
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
> To: Duane Hill
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
> really? news to me ;)
Not sa-com
> -Original Message-
> From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 8:06 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
>
>
Duane Hill writes:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Duane Hill writes:
> >> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >>
> >> [SNIP]
> >>> There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
> >>> tarball.
> >>> cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
> >>> rm -rf
>
og files.
>>>
>>> Now I have to run some mail through to test it out. This is not a
>>> production server and I want to make sure of no errors before going live.
>>>
>>
>> Didn't work here:
>> ===> Found saved configuration for p5-Mail-SpamAssass
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Duane Hill writes:
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
[SNIP]
There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
tarball.
cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
rm -rf
Untar this there: http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa320.tg
Duane Hill writes:
> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
> > There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
> > tarball.
> > cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
> > rm -rf
> >
> > Untar this there: http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa320.tgz
>
> Just an F
> -Original Message-
> From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:51 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> [S
e mail through to test it out. This is not a
production server and I want to make sure of no errors before going live.
Didn't work here:
===> Found saved configuration for p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0
===> Extracting for p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0
=> MD5 Checksum OK for Mail-SpamAssa
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
[SNIP]
There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
tarball.
cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
rm -rf
Untar this there: http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa320.tgz
Just an FYI followup. I have upgraded without any errors. I
r p wrote:
I can not even get the 3.2 to run cleanly due to ImageInfo.
When I leave the ImageInfo in the init.pre and in the plugin directory I get:
That's the problem, ImageInfo is enabled in v320.pre in the new SA, review that
old init.pre .
What plugin directory? what do you mean by that
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:59:13PM -0700, r p wrote:
> I can not even get the 3.2 to run cleanly due to ImageInfo.
> When I leave the ImageInfo in the init.pre and in the plugin directory I get:
> warn: Subroutine new redefined at /etc/mail/spamassassin/ImageInfo.pm
> line 68.
You have the standar
On 2 May 2007 at 15:32, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> The ImageInfo packaged with 3.2.0 isn't the latest version from SARE as
> it's missing the image_name_regex method.
>
> -=B
>
>
I can not even get the 3.2 to run cleanly due to ImageInfo.
When I leave the ImageInfo in the init.pre and in the plugin dir
ROTECTED]
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
>>
>> Any projection when SA-3.2 will be in the FBSD ports? Sent
>> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but bounced back.
>>
>> Thanks for any news on this
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack L. Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:20 AM
> To: Justin Mason; users@spamassassin.apache.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAss
understand keeping the descriptions
concise, they just waste people's time if the functions are not available,
and not even recommended.
Great program, just wish I could use the thing!
Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>
At 10:03 AM 5.4.2007 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>>> and contains a significant number of changes and major enhanc
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org
Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> I just ran into a big problem..
>
> [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand
> (3), aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm
> line 136
Double check your config for your database, make sure it
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
>please use it!
>
>Downloads are available from:
> http://spamassassin.apache
Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> I just ran into a big problem..
>
> [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand
> (3), aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm
> line 136
>
>
> Any ideas please?
>
> Anders
What version did y
I had a problem with re2c v0.11.3 segfaulting when bogus-virus-warnings.cf
was in use (?). 0.12.0 runs ok.
A.
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting Justin Mason:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&a
Quoting Justin Mason:
>>> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&atid=616200
>>> re2c 12.0 works for me.
>> re2c-0.11.1:Compile regular express
> yep, apparently 0.11.3 works -- see bug 5435.
A
James Lay wrote:
>
> So my upgrade of Spamassassin takes a full five minutes to -D --lint
> and about the same time to load up. Here's my local.cf file:
>
> required_score 4.0
> rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
> report_safe 0
> use_bayes 1
> use_
Michael Scheidell writes:
> Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> > Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >
>
> > sa-compile didn't show any errors (which is bad, I'd say).
> >
> > see
> > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
> > and
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
sa-compile didn't show any errors (which is bad, I'd say).
see
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
and
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&atid=616200
re2c 12.0 works for me.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Still get this on Freebsd, sa-compile SEEMS to run fine, but this
> happens
>
> [97520] dbg: rules: compiled one_line_body tests
> [97520] dbg: zoom: run_body_fast_scan for body_0 start
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
> /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/3.002000/auto/Mail/SpamAssas
SLES10 FWIW.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:43 AM
To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
Apache
Craig Carriere wrote:
I receive the exact same error on SLES10 FWIW.
I am assuming it's something to do with loader paths', but I haven't
figured it out yet.
as for the FREEBSD port (which I maintain) I think I am going to publish
the package without sa-compile, so it gets out there
(any f
: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the
official release, and contains a significant number of
changes and major enhancements -- please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200705021400
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:43 AM
> To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
> Apache S
So my upgrade of Spamassassin takes a full five minutes to -D --lint and
about the same time to load up. Here's my local.cf file:
required_score 4.0
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Lay wrote:
> Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
>
> * ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is
> installed, but we need version >= 0.002001
> ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:11 AM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following error
Hi All,
Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following errors
after updating to 3.2.0?
I've tried upgrading ImageInfo with no difference. I'm going to try
upgrading the Perl modules now to see if any of those are out of date.
>[3168] warn: Subroutine new redefined at /etc/mail/spama
On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:33:16 -0400
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Lay wrote:
> > Hey all!
> >
> > Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
> >
> > * ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is
> > installed, but we need version >= 0.002001
> > ERR
James Lay wrote:
Hey all!
Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
* ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is
installed, but we need version >= 0.002001
ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the
versions
of the modules indicated above bef
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:31PM -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> The ImageInfo packaged with 3.2.0 isn't the latest version from SARE as
> it's missing the image_name_regex method.
We can only include that which is donated to the project.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
First solid fuel we've had si
The ImageInfo packaged with 3.2.0 isn't the latest version from SARE as
it's missing the image_name_regex method.
-=B
ge -
> From: "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MIMEDefang List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:49 PM
> Subject: [Mimedefang] SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and re2c speedup
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://lwn.n
aryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:56 AM
To: Eric Goforth
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SA] ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
Eric Goforth wrote:
> Will this upgrade be available via Yum repositories?
I don'
Eric Goforth wrote:
Will this upgrade be available via Yum repositories?
I don't see why not; at least eventually. Like most software, though,
you'll have to wait for the package maintainer to package and publish
the new version. The SA project does not release packages.
Daryl
Will this upgrade be available via Yum repositories?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:43 AM
To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA] ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0
Julian?
Original Message
Subject:SPF upgrade errors for SpamAssassin 3.2.0
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:54:52 -0600
From: James Lay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Hey all!
Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
* ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DN
Mário Gamito wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official
> release, and contains a significant number of changes and major
> enhancements
And what are they ?
I'm not very fond of messing around with a very stable server.
I
Justin Mason wrote:
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official
> release, and contains a significant number of changes and major
> enhancements
And what are they ?
I'm not very fond of messing around with a very stable server.
I'm using 3.1.8
Regards,
Mário Gamito
Hey all!
Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see:
* ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is installed,
but we need version >= 0.002001
ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the
versions
of the modules indicated above before proceeding with th
Am/On Wed, 2 May 2007 14:11:34 +0100 schrieb/wrote Justin Mason:
>
>Rick Macdougall writes:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>> > Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official
release,
>> > and contains a significant number of changes and major enha
Justin Mason wrote:
Rick Macdougall writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Quick question.
If I use sa-compile, which works very well here btw
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official
>> release,
>> and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
>> please use it!
>
> Quick question.
>
> If I use sa-comp
Rick Macdougall writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
> > and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
> > please use it!
>
> Quick question.
>
> If I use sa-compil
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Quick question.
If I use sa-compile, which works very well here btw, do I need to re-run
it after downloading
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200705021400
md5sum of archive files
Justin Mason wrote:
Rick Macdougall writes:
Vincent Li wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commented out in v320.pre.
Have you specified
whitelist_bounce_relays
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
Rick Macdougall writes:
> Vincent Li wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > > It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
> > > don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commen
Justin Mason wrote:
Rick Macdougall writes:
Vincent Li wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commented out in v320.pre.
Have you specified
whitelist_bounce_relays
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Vincent Li wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
> don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commented out in
> v320.pre.
>
Have you specified
whitel
Rick Macdougall writes:
> Vincent Li wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> >>
> >> It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
> >> don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commented out in v320.pre.
> >>
> >
> > Have you specified
> >
> > whitel
Vincent Li wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
don't see any VBounce rules firing. It is not commented out in v320.pre.
Have you specified
whitelist_bounce_relays hostname_of_your_MTA
in /etc/mail/sp
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
It's running here but I'm getting hamme
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
It's running here but I'm getting hammered by joe job bounces and I
don't see an
Rosenbaum, Larry M. writes:
> > > 2) I tried to compile the rules to see how much speed increase I
> could
> > > get, but it didn't work. After running sa-compile and uncommenting
> the
> > > Rule2XSBody plugin, I got the following error:
> > >
> > > # spamassassin --lint
> > > ld.so.1: /usr/loca
> > 2) I tried to compile the rules to see how much speed increase I
could
> > get, but it didn't work. After running sa-compile and uncommenting
the
> > Rule2XSBody plugin, I got the following error:
> >
> > # spamassassin --lint
> > ld.so.1: /usr/local/bin/spamassassin: fatal: relocation error:
Rosenbaum, Larry M. writes:
> 1) Now that spamc is linked with zlib, it doesn't link correctly on
> Solaris 8 where libz.so is in /usr/local/lib. Attempting to run spamc
> gives the following error:
>
> ld.so.1: ../spamc/spamc: fatal: libz.so: open failed: No such file or
> directory
>
> A work
Testing v3.2.0-rc3 on Solaris 8
I'm finding zillions of the following errors in the log file:
Apr 24 10:13:27 emaildev.ornl.gov spamd[12593]: Malformed UTF-8
character (unexpected non-continuation by
te 0x00, immediately after start byte 0xce) in pattern match (m//) at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sa
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
on Freebsd 5.5, after (what I think) is a successful sa-compile:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/3.002000/auto/Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 PRERELEASE available!
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a
*PRERELEASE*,
> not the full release of 3.2.0.
I have found the following (non-fatal) issues wit
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:47:29PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> are we missing the tools subdirectory?
> is is being removed?
Yes, tools was removed from the tarball, along with masses and contrib.
It's all still available via SVN/http.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
An authority is anyone w
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejm/devel/>
are we missing the tools subdirectory?
is is
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc3 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
Downloading
---
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-rc3.tar.bz2
http
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc2 is now available! This is a *PRERELEASE*,
not the full release of 3.2.0.
Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
Downloading
---
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-rc2.tar.bz2
http
--On Friday, March 23, 2007 3:10 PM + Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So when are the betas of the "(STILL TODO ;)"'s coming out? :-)
Doc has promised to do them really soon. ;)
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5382
And according to that bug, it's now in th
Randal, Phil writes:
> Those "(STILL TODO ;)" bits are the things which would convince me to
> test it.
>
> Without them I'm rather in the dark as to what has changed, what needs
> to be changed in my config, and what areas need careful attention.
>
> So when are the betas of the "(STILL TODO ;)
oming out? :-)
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 March 2007 21:15
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; dev@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subje
SpamAssassin 3.2.0-rc1 is released!
This is a *prerelease* for SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release.
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical and
heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited bulk email).
Highlights of the release
SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre3 is released!
This is a *prerelease* of SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release.
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical and
heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited bulk email).
Highlights of the release
Nick Leverton writes:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2007 23:53, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> > Btw, the following warnings (in v320) seem excessive, a null return path
> > (aka envelope sender) is normal and constitute few percent of all mail:
> >
> > message: envelope_sender_header '' is not an FQDN - ignor
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 23:53, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Btw, the following warnings (in v320) seem excessive, a null return path
> (aka envelope sender) is normal and constitute few percent of all mail:
>
> message: envelope_sender_header '' is not an FQDN - ignoring
> at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/s
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
