I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with Exchange 2003
for some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I was using Chris
Lewis' ESA sink which worked great. However, after an upgrade to Exchange
2007, I've come to realize that the old smtp sinks have been deprecated
007 7:18 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SpamAssassin on Exchange 2007
I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with
Exchange 2003 for some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I
was using Chris Lewis' ESA sink whic
I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with Exchange 2003 for
some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I was using Chris Lewis' ESA
sink which worked great. However, after an upgrade to Exchange 2007, I've come
to realize that the old smtp sinks have been deprecated an
nge anything, but it
sure appears to.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Eric C Sandquist
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin on Exchange...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW, as far as I know (I'm not sure about the sink's details) SpamAssassin
doesn't actually modify the message body it was passed (unless it was
marked as spam).
I'd suggest dumping the message body strings at several points in the
sink, including di
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 4:20 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Cc: Eric C Sandquist
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin on Exchange...
Hi Eric,
I had some fun with pdf files too (even before I met SA the first time),
but
Hi Eric,
I had some fun with pdf files too (even before I met SA the first time),
but I receive binary files pretty often ... and usually undisturbed
A pdf file MAY look like a text file to a naive sender (this depends on pdf
features,
and the pdf spec specifically has a few non-text characters
, 2005 3:17 PM
To: 'Eric C Sandquist'; 'Martin Hepworth'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin on Exchange...
Just changed the sink from "Mail from=*" to "rctp [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ...
Sent an pdf to me at an outside a
From: Eric C Sandquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:05 PM
To: 'Martin Hepworth'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin on Exchange...
I've disabled all the plugins and added MIME-Base64-Perl(don't know if tha
PAM(35,000) and
HAM(14,000) folders...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:42 AM
To: Eric C Sandquist
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin on Exchange...
Eric
you might want t
Eric
you might want to make sure all the prerequisite Perl modules are
installed and upto date.
mailScanner has had some similar issues which where (I think, only two
coffees so far this morning) caused by the MIME modules.
If you can't get any further I'll try and dig out more info, but I'd
s
Currently Using:
SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) Exchange SpamAssassin Sink
(www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.6
-Original Message-
From: JamesDR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 11:55 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin on Exchange
Which tool are you using to connect between exchange and spamassassin?
Thanks,
JamesDR
Eric C Sandquist wrote:
I have gotten SpamAssassin(Latest Release) to work with exchange using
one of the sinks.
It seems to be doing a wonderful job of catching spam..
BUT --- It is also damaging
Doesn't seem that SA itself should be able to do this, since it isn't
supposed to change the mail except to add the scores. I suppose it could be
a line-ending problem if you are running SA itself on Windows.
But I'd more think this is a problem with whatever tool you have used to
integrate SA wi
I have gotten SpamAssassin(Latest Release) to work with exchange using
one of the sinks.
It seems to be doing a wonderful job of catching spam..
BUT --- It is also damaging attachments, specifically PDFs… Any
ideas??? I seem to remember this happening a couple of years ago…
15 matches
Mail list logo
