Re: Some tips email gateway

Hi ,Few days ago, finished installing postfix 3.0 and spamassassin 3.4 , I have a doubt with the part of downstream server "MX", so I defined my MX in DNS: ### Actual DNS domain.com. IN MX 0 scmmific.domain.com. ### this would be the recommended settings ###: domain.com. IN MX 0 scmmif

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 21.02.2015 um 14:49 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote: Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.o

Re: Some tips email gateway

On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote: Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it makes exactly the same job, but halves number of q

Re: Some tips email gateway

On 02/17/2015 11:16 PM, ricky gutierrez wrote: 2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb : _ also prevented by my suggestion of "header_checks" BCC with Postfix 3.0 Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was specified with NOTI

Re: Some tips email gateway

2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb : >> _ >> >> also prevented by my suggestion of "header_checks" BCC with Postfix 3.0 >> >> Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was specified with >> NOTIFY=NONE. The sender will not be no

Re: Some tips email gateway

On 02/17/2015 10:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb: On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through tra

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb: On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send e-mail server to a

Re: Some tips email gateway

On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send e-mail server to another server with a specific account.

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Martin Gregorie: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send e-mail server to another server with a specific accoun

Re: Some tips email gateway

On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: > this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server > with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send > e-mail server to another server with a specific account. > > I was looking for how to handle this w

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: 2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden : Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote: Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, why not rej

Re: Some tips email gateway

2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden : Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote: Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it makes exactly the sa

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Antony Stone: On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote: 2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : where the ccount lives don't matter the only resticiton is that "header_checks" BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works for "header_checks" and *not* "smtp_he

Re: Some tips email gateway

ok I'll be test with their advice, I will be in touch with you regardss 2015-02-17 14:16 GMT-06:00 Antony Stone : > On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote: > >> 2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : >> > where the ccount lives don't matter >> > >> > the only resticiton is tha

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 21:05 schrieb ricky gutierrez: 2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : where the ccount lives don't matter the only resticiton is that "header_checks" BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works for "header_checks" and *not* "smtp_header_checks", hence it need to be defined on the downs

Re: Some tips email gateway

On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote: > 2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : > > where the ccount lives don't matter > > > > the only resticiton is that "header_checks" BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works > > for "header_checks" and *not* "smtp_header_checks", hence it need to b

Re: Some tips email gateway

2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : > > > > where the ccount lives don't matter > > the only resticiton is that "header_checks" BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works > for "header_checks" and *not* "smtp_header_checks", hence it need to be > defined on the downstream server instead on the MX Reindl

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 20:38 schrieb ricky gutierrez: this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send e-mail server to another server with a specific account. I was looking for how to handle this with postfix whe

Re: Some tips email gateway

this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send e-mail server to another server with a specific account. I was looking for how to handle this with postfix 2015-02-17 13:14 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 17.

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 20:25 schrieb ricky gutierrez: 2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden : Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org while my other answer solves the "how to get training messages

Re: Some tips email gateway

2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden : > Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? > > -- Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, -- rickygm http://gnuforever.homelinux.com

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 20:03 schrieb ricky gutierrez: Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business, I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav + spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a

Re: Some tips email gateway

Am 17.02.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Jeremy McSpadden: Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? that was not the question the question was how to get spam/ham-samples for train bayes after all other filters and RBL's are running in a sane setup long before contentfilters see me response to that t

Re: Some tips email gateway

Are you using any RBLs with postfix ? -- Jeremy McSpadden Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955 On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:05 PM, ricky gutierrez mailto:xserverli...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Some tips email gateway

Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business, I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav + spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a Bayesian db. I am not an expert in postfix and spam