ok I'll be test with their advice, I will be in touch with you

regardss

2015-02-17 14:16 GMT-06:00 Antony Stone
<antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it>:
> On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
>
>> 2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>:
>> > where the ccount lives don't matter
>> >
>> > the only resticiton is that "header_checks" BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
>> > for "header_checks" and *not* "smtp_header_checks", hence it need to be
>> > defined on the downstream server instead on the MX
>>
>> Reindl let me understand, the postfix could leave a copy BCC locally
>> on the gateway, or send a copy to another MX server defined in my
>> bind?
>
> BCCs will be delivered wherever the address points to.  If your gateway has
> mail accounts (unlikely?) then they can be delivered there; otherwise they'll
> go to whichever is the MX for the BCC address.
>
>> > where the target address itself is located don't matter, postfix just
>> > generates a BCC and sends it to that local or remote address
>> >
>> > but be sure you consider the legal implications!
>>
>> if this is'll have to talk to my boss.
>
> Basically, you must ensure that nobody ever sees the emails - they must only
> be used for automated processing, unless there is a very good and justified
> reason for looking at some of them to investigate problems etc (and even in
> this case the person is only allowed to look at the part of the email needed
> to investigate - so if they need to see the body of a false-positive ham-
> identified-as-spam, they shouldn't look at the headers.  If they need to see
> the headers, they almost certainly shouldn't see the recipient (since that's
> very unlikely ever to be involved in classifying an email as ham or spam)).
>
>
> Hope that helps,
>
>
> Antony.
>
> --
> #define SIX 1+5
> #define NINE 8+1
>
> int main() {
>     printf("%d\n", SIX * NINE);
> }
>         - thanks to ECB for bringing this to my attention
>
>                                                    Please reply to the list;
>                                                          please *don't* CC me.



-- 
rickygm

http://gnuforever.homelinux.com

Reply via email to