Re: Silly Question

2006-05-04 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 22:10 Brent Kennedy wrote: > My problem with that > is that some companies don't have them even though they are > legitimate. They usually don't have them because of the lack of good > or full time IT staff. Sell them service. I ususally offer to make their system fixed, i

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Brent Kennedy wrote: > rules. The issue before here, is that spamassassin doesn't split emails up > between recipients when a message is sent to multiple people. If one user > is on the whitelist_to or all_spam_to or some_spam_to list, then everyone > gets its. [snip..] This

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
Brent Kennedy wrote: > Bowie wrote: > > Greg Allen wrote: > > > Also, now that AOL is blocking all email with no PTR record, you can > > > probably kill a lot of spam with that right on the front end now. If > > > anyone complains, ask them how they email to AOL. :-) > > > > I could get away with

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Brent Kennedy
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:06 PM To: Brent Kennedy Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Silly Question Brent Kennedy wrote: > Wow.. You definitely went the opposite direction. Although, I did > appreciate a well written explanation of the bayes system. Well, I intenti

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Brent Kennedy
esday, May 03, 2006 3:15 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Silly Question Greg Allen wrote: > I know some people use the public folder drag-drop for learning spam, > but I personally don't like the whole idea. And I did consider it. > > I would rather work sma

Re: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Brent Kennedy wrote: > Wow.. You definitely went the opposite direction. Although, I did > appreciate a well written explanation of the bayes system. Well, I intentionally went the opposite way, to make sure that at least you realize what is really going on. I wasn't really intending that to be

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Brent Kennedy
nt Kennedy; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Silly Question I know some people use the public folder drag-drop for learning spam, but I personally don't like the whole idea. And I did consider it. I would rather work smarter on the server end to kill or mark the spam before it gets

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Brent Kennedy
TED] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:47 PM To: Brent Kennedy Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Silly Question Brent Kennedy wrote: > Here is my explanation for how spamassassin learns email as > spam(laymans > terms): > > 1. Users receive the junk email > 2. The u

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
Greg Allen wrote: > I know some people use the public folder drag-drop for learning spam, > but I personally don't like the whole idea. And I did consider it. > > I would rather work smarter on the server end to kill or mark the spam > before it gets to the user. > > I don't think users should ha

Re: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread jp
I don't do the learning thing. http://www.midcoast.com/help/email/spam.html is how we explain it to users. On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:53:57PM -0400, Brent Kennedy wrote: > I am trying my best to explain to a non-technical person how spamassassin > works. The other issue I have is that I am tryi

Re: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Brent Kennedy wrote: > Here is my explanation for how spamassassin learns email as spam(laymans > terms): > > 1. Users receive the junk email > 2. The users who received the junk email drags and drops the email to the > spammail public folder in outlook > 3. Spamassassin connects to the internal

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Greg Allen
m: Brent Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:54 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Silly Question > > > I am trying my best to explain to a non-technical person how spamassassin > works. The other issue I have is that I am trying

RE: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
; legitimate messages, but that's an added detail that only muddies the > waters. > > And FWIW, I don't think it's a silly question at all. Some people > have the luxury of only filtering their own mail, and can be as > hard-line as they want. The rest of us have to

Re: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Kris Deugau
Brent Kennedy wrote: I am trying my best to explain to a non-technical person how spamassassin works. The other issue I have is that I am trying to explain to them why they need to drag mail to a public folder so the server can learn it as spam. They say they are doing it but they get the messa

Re: Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Mike Jackson
dered spam. You could also explain that there's some rules with negative point values, and these represent characteristics that are more common of legitimate messages, but that's an added detail that only muddies the waters. And FWIW, I don't think it's a silly question at all. S

Silly Question

2006-05-03 Thread Brent Kennedy
I am trying my best to explain to a non-technical person how spamassassin works. The other issue I have is that I am trying to explain to them why they need to drag mail to a public folder so the server can learn it as spam. They say they are doing it but they get the message several times a day.