On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Andre wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.02.09 21:39, Andre wrote:
spamc is never called from Exim in this case, so the --ssl switch
can't be
used. At least that is my understanding (maybe mis-understanding?)
of the
situation.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.02.09 21:39, Andre wrote:
> > spamc is never called from Exim in this case, so the --ssl switch can't be
> > used. At least that is my understanding (maybe mis-understanding?) of the
> > situation.
>
> Doesn't exim even have the option fo
> > mouss wrote:
> > > stunnel may be more appropriate, and easier to setup and control than
> > > ssh, in this particular case.
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jason Haar wrote:
> > What's wrong with spamc's native "--ssl" mode - plus a simple ACL at the
> > spamd end to limit who can reach it? Chances are
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jason Haar wrote:
> mouss wrote:
> > stunnel may be more appropriate, and easier to setup and control than
> > ssh, in this particular case.
> >
> >
> What's wrong with spamc's native "--ssl" mode - plus a simple ACL at the
> spamd end to limit who can reach it? Chances are t
mouss wrote:
> stunnel may be more appropriate, and easier to setup and control than
> ssh, in this particular case.
>
>
What's wrong with spamc's native "--ssl" mode - plus a simple ACL at the
spamd end to limit who can reach it? Chances are there's a firewall
involved in this situation anyway.
Andre a écrit :
> I haven't thought about a VPN yet, but it could probably work. I only
> thought about a ssh tunnel so far, which may also work.
>
stunnel may be more appropriate, and easier to setup and control than
ssh, in this particular case.
> Still, if anyone knows an esay off-the-shelf s
Andre wrote:
Hi,
we run Exim (4.69) with mail scanned at smtp time via acl. We put an
external spamd server to work (works fine).
Now we want to extend that setup by permitting another mail server (Exim,
same setup) to connect to the spamd server. However, that transport has to
happen over th
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Andre wrote:
I haven't thought about a VPN yet, but it could probably work. I only
thought about a ssh tunnel so far, which may also work.
That's what I was going to suggest. It's a lot more lightweight than a VPN
if this is going to be the only reason the two servers are
I haven't thought about a VPN yet, but it could probably work. I only
thought about a ssh tunnel so far, which may also work.
Still, if anyone knows an esay off-the-shelf solution for exim I'd prefer
that (if it exists).
Thank you,
-andre
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 200
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:46 -0500, Andre wrote:
> However, we can't find a way to tell exim to connect via SSL (basically
> the equivalent of 'spamc -S').
>
> So, how do we enable SSL here? Is anyone running a similar setup? Are
> we just missing something? Other stories to tell...
>
Would settin
Hi,
we run Exim (4.69) with mail scanned at smtp time via acl. We put an
external spamd server to work (works fine).
Now we want to extend that setup by permitting another mail server (Exim,
same setup) to connect to the spamd server. However, that transport has to
happen over the open internet,
11 matches
Mail list logo
