On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jason Haar wrote:
> mouss wrote: > > stunnel may be more appropriate, and easier to setup and control than > > ssh, in this particular case. > > > > > What's wrong with spamc's native "--ssl" mode - plus a simple ACL at the > spamd end to limit who can reach it? Chances are there's a firewall > involved in this situation anyway... > spamc is never called from Exim in this case, so the --ssl switch can't be used. At least that is my understanding (maybe mis-understanding?) of the situation. Thanks all for the tips so far. -andre > -- > Cheers > > Jason Haar > Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. > Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 > PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 >
