On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:40:27 -0400
Alex wrote:
> Even 2.8 points for merely the word "xanax" alone, without any other
> basis for consideration, sounds too high.
Actually it's looking for something that looks like xanax, but isn't
xanax.
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, these FUZZY rules
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2017, at 21:35, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules:
Hi,
>> It also hit a secondary RBL for an IP that it shouldn't have, as well
>> as bayes00 and hostkarma_bl, totaling 5.044, making it spam. The IP
>> that was hit was 52.40.63.1, mta1b3.c1-t.msyscloud.com.
>>
>> I would have included that initially, but I figured any one phrase
>> shouldn't be en
It happened again. This is a kind of a recursion bomb ;-)
Am 25.04.2017 um 03:35 schrieb Alex:
> Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
> -- --
> 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
> b
On 24 Apr 2017, at 21:35, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* h
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* hit? W
Hi,
>> Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
>> the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
>>
>> Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
>> ==> got hit: "your account security"
>
> What *else* hit? What was the final tot
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* hit? What wa
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
Thanks,
Alex
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/13/2014 6:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> Below is my SA.
> The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got
> hit".
> What am I missing?
Rules whose names begin with two unders
M. Rodrigo Monteiro skrev den 2014-05-13 20:43:
The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got
hit". What am I missing?
remove __ on the meta rules, then it works
ok:
meta foo (__bar && __bare)
not ok:
meta __foo (__bar && __bare)
rules begining with __ cant have score
"M. Rodrigo Monteiro" schrieb am 13. Mai
2014 um 20:43 +0200:
>The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got hit".
>What am I missing?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
states
"rules starting with a double underscore are evaluated with no score, and
are intend
Hi All.
Below is my SA.
The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got hit".
What am I missing?
= Init =
/usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -D -d -c -m24 --username
spamfilter -H /opt/spamassassin -s /opt/spamassassin/spamassassin.log -r
/var/run/spamd.pid
= Init =
= V
On 5/13/2014 6:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
Below is my SA.
The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got hit".
What am I missing?
Rules whose names begin with two underscores do not contribute to the
score. You'd need somethin
On Tue, 13 May 2014, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
Below is my SA.
The problem is that the score is 0.0, but in the debug log has "got hit".
What am I missing?
Rules whose names begin with two underscores do not contribute to the
score. You'd need something like:
meta SCORED_RULE__UNSCOR
15 matches
Mail list logo
