Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-04 Thread Anthony Peacock
Hi Giga, giga328 wrote: Thank you Jeff and Anthony. If I'm right, there is big possibility for SpamAssassin to mark as spam some email from for example doubleclick or other companies if there is personalized URL in it because it can look like spam or even like phishing. If I'm protecting only my

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-02 Thread Jeff Chan
Quoting giga328 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thank you Jeff and Anthony. If I'm right, there is big possibility for SpamAssassin to mark as spam some email from for example doubleclick or other companies if there is personalized URL in it because it can look like spam or even like phishing. If I'm prot

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-02 Thread giga328
Thank you Jeff and Anthony. If I'm right, there is big possibility for SpamAssassin to mark as spam some email from for example doubleclick or other companies if there is personalized URL in it because it can look like spam or even like phishing. If I'm protecting only my mailbox it will be ok to

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-02 Thread Anthony Peacock
Hi Mous, mouss wrote: giga328 wrote: Hi Anthony, I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from MailScanner. But since I just star

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread Jeff Chan
Quoting mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: giga328 wrote: Hi Anthony, I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from MailScanner. But sinc

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread mouss
giga328 wrote: Hi Anthony, I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from MailScanner. But since I just started to use SpamAssassing

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Friday, February 1, 2008 3:10 -0800 giga328 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have question about one list from MailScanner. It is list at http://www.mailscanner.info/phishing.safe.sites.conf.master and here is part of text from it: This file contains the list of all the sites which can be s

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread Anthony Peacock
Hi, I wasn't suggesting that you used MailScanner, I was merely pointing out that these lists are very specifically created and used for a feature of MailScanner that has nothing to do with SPAM detection, ie the Phising Detection feature. Because of that you will need to know what the inclu

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread giga328
Hi Anthony, I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from MailScanner. But since I just started to use SpamAssassing I'm asking is i

Re: Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread Anthony Peacock
Hi, Those files are effectively, white and black lists for the Phising detection feature of MailScanner. I have never heard of anyone using them to add scores to spam. Your best best, might be to ask on the MailScanner mailing list, where the author regularly contributes. He would be able

Safe "Phishing"

2008-02-01 Thread giga328
I have question about one list from MailScanner. It is list at http://www.mailscanner.info/phishing.safe.sites.conf.master and here is part of text from it: This file contains the list of all the sites which can be safely ignored in the "phishing fraud" checks. My question can it be used by SpamA