Hi Anthony, I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from MailScanner. But since I just started to use SpamAssassing I'm asking is it wise and needed.
Regards, Giga Anthony Peacock wrote: > > Hi, > > Those files are effectively, white and black lists for the Phising > detection feature of MailScanner. I have never heard of anyone using > them to add scores to spam. > > Your best best, might be to ask on the MailScanner mailing list, where > the author regularly contributes. He would be able to give you a > clearer idea about this. > > -- > Anthony Peacock > CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School > WWW: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/ > "A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan, > they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could result in > a lot of things." - Carl Princi, 2002/07/19 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Safe-%22Phishing%22-tp15224704p15225208.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
