Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>> An informal check does show that the IPs are indeed listed. As many
>> of them should be - there are many people using cable modems and DSL
>> who are listed in dynablocks because they are supposed to be using
>> their ISP's mail server. But in a sit
Don Levey wrote:
An informal check does show that the IPs are indeed listed. As many of them
should be - there are many people using cable modems and DSL who are listed
in dynablocks because they are supposed to be using their ISP's mail server.
But in a situation where they do that, if the ISP re
martin smith wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> Don Levey wrote:
>
>>
>> It was pointed out to me that SURBL lists only check URLs - I
>> apologise for that. I *am* getting the problem described
>> above with hits on Spamcop and SORBS. Additionally,
>> apparently even the mere text mention o
Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/27/2005
01:48:40 PM:
> > Oh its real! However my nachos are home made using Cool Ranch
Doritos. ;)
> > I'm willing to try your version! I haven't run into a food I
won't try.
> >
> > --Chris
>
>
> Maybe you should go on fear factor then ;)
>
> -Jim
>-Original Message-
>From: Theodore Heise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 3:17 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: SPEWS still sucks
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>
>> Oh its r
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> Oh its real! However my nachos are home made using Cool Ranch Doritos. ;)
Naw. They're not homemade until you fry the chips yourself. Might
even have to press out the tortillas to qualify...
--
Theodore (Ted) Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bl
Chris Santerre wrote:
From: jdow
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--Chris
(D.Q. has forced me to kill a plate of nachos! Damn you D.Q.
those nachos
had families!)
Real nachos or something from the likes of Taco Bell or Del Taco?
(At my favorite Mexican place near here a nachos appetize
>From: jdow
>
>From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> --Chris
>> (D.Q. has forced me to kill a plate of nachos! Damn you D.Q.
>those nachos
>> had families!)
>
>Real nachos or something from the likes of Taco Bell or Del Taco?
>(At my favorite Mexican place near here a nachos appetizer
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --Chris
> (D.Q. has forced me to kill a plate of nachos! Damn you D.Q. those nachos
> had families!)
Real nachos or something from the likes of Taco Bell or Del Taco?
(At my favorite Mexican place near here a nachos appetizer comes
in a half size versi
|-Original Message-
|Don Levey wrote:
|
|It was pointed out to me that SURBL lists only check URLs - I
|apologise for that. I *am* getting the problem described
|above with hits on Spamcop and SORBS. Additionally,
|apparently even the mere text mention of a .biz address
|triggers tha
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:27:57AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Being that SURBL deals ONLY with URLs, what the heck are you talking about?
Maybe he is still using osirusoft (has nothing to do with SURBL, I know)?
Rainer
>> Why is the WS FP rate still that high? Yes it catches the most spam,
>> but please please please report ANY FPs you get right away. It needs
>> to be under .10 in my mind. If we don't do this soon, I will start
>> taking plates of nachos hostage. You don't want to know what I'll do
>> to them!!
Don Levey wrote:
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
>> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>>> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
people to actually use it. Sa
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is the WS FP rate still that high? Yes it catches the most spam,
> but please please please report ANY FPs you get right away. It needs
> to be under .10 in my mind. If we don't do this soon, I will start
> taking plates of nachos hostage. You don't
Hi!
Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly
mass-check results for SURBL:
Perhaps he means spews lists lists.surbl.org. I can't see anyone
having issues with any of the SURBL RBL's.
I must not have things set up correctly then.
I get many MANY false positives from the SURBL l
>-Original Message-
>From: Don Levey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:09 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: SPEWS still sucks
>
>
>Rick Macdougall wrote:
>> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>>> Raymon
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
>>> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
>>> people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do.
>>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:09 PM
>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
>Cc: Daniel Quinlan; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SPEWS still sucks
>
>
>Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PRO
At 07:55 PM 1/26/2005, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
I thought I'd pass this on to the users list. This is from work I was
doing on bug 4105... a quick mass-check run of SPEWS rules:
It's not even worth finishing the mass-check...
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
17895 9
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Yes, Bingo!
> >>
> >>Why would i have a problem with SURBL,
> >
> >
> > I was wondering...
> >
> >
> >>JP_SURBL is 'my' list...
> >
> >
> > Well, then my res
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes, Bingo!
Why would i have a problem with SURBL,
I was wondering...
JP_SURBL is 'my' list...
Well, then my response makes even less sense, but hey, you gotta use
complete sentences! :-p
Daniel
Heheh, Foot, meet Mouth. :)
Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, Bingo!
>
> Why would i have a problem with SURBL,
I was wondering...
> JP_SURBL is 'my' list...
Well, then my response makes even less sense, but hey, you gotta use
complete sentences! :-p
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com
Hi!
Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do.
Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly mass-check
results for SURBL:
Daniel -- I think he m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
> > understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
> > people to actually use it. Sadly, p
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 5:08:54 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
>> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
>> people to actually use it. Sadly, people stil
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do.
Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to di
Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully
> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for
> people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do.
Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly mas
Hi!
Not going to add these, obviously. That's just nuts, even worse than
SPEWS used to be. Top domains among their ham blacklistings:
[in this section of my personal ham corpus]]
57 apache.org
96 ActiveState.com
114 debian.org
Also, yahoo.com, sourceforge.net, julianhaight.com
I thought I'd pass this on to the users list. This is from work I was
doing on bug 4105... a quick mass-check run of SPEWS rules:
It's not even worth finishing the mass-check...
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
17895 9097 87980.508 0.000.00 (all
29 matches
Mail list logo
