On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 5:08:54 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully >> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for >> people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do. > Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly mass-check > results for SURBL: I think Raymond is referring to the SPEWS list being not too useful, given its high FP rate. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
