Re: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 12:12:06 -0400 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 9/9/2018 11:51 AM, thatvolvonut wrote: > > Good catch - I guess I didn't look over that file close enough. I > > removed the flag and ran a `systemctl restart spamass-milter` and > > my subjects are getting tagged now! However, SpamAss

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

On 09.09.18 17:51, thatvolvonut wrote: Good catch - I guess I didn't look over that file close enough. I removed the flag and ran a `systemctl restart spamass-milter` and my subjects are getting tagged now! However, SpamAssassin is still failing to add the custom 'Score' header I've specified in

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

You are not at the mercy of whatever spamass-milter decides to do. There are 2 things spamass-milter can do with the mail: 1. accept the mail 2. reject the mail Whether it rejects depends on the spam score passed by Spamassassin. See the -r parameter in the spamass-milter man page that will d

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

That sounds accurate, yes.  Apache SpamAssassin is a program AND an API.  When it's used like an API, it's very flexible. On 9/9/2018 1:08 PM, thatvolvonut wrote: > OK, I think I get it now. If I wanted to use spamassassin natively, I'd need > to ditch spamass-milter (a standalone application sep

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

OK, I think I get it now. If I wanted to use spamassassin natively, I'd need to ditch spamass-milter (a standalone application separate from spamassassin) and find another solution, like a true spamd/spamc setup that postfix would pass messages to after they're received. As-is, with spamass-milt

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

On 9/9/2018 11:51 AM, thatvolvonut wrote: > Good catch - I guess I didn't look over that file close enough. I removed the > flag and ran a `systemctl restart spamass-milter` and my subjects are getting > tagged now! However, SpamAssassin is still failing to add the custom 'Score' > header I've

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

Good catch - I guess I didn't look over that file close enough. I removed the flag and ran a `systemctl restart spamass-milter` and my subjects are getting tagged now! However, SpamAssassin is still failing to add the custom 'Score' header I've specified in my config. If I'm understanding it co

Re: Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

I'm not a spamass-milter but google helps you are using -m switch with spamass-milter which as per docs: "Disables modification of the 'Subject:' and 'Content-Type:' headers and message body." more details from spamass-milter man page On 09/09/2018 03:34 PM, thatvolvonut wrote: Boiler

Fwd: Spam Tagging Issue - V3.4.1 with Postfix 3.1.0

Boilerplate Info: Platform: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS SpamAssassin Version: 3.4.1 Invocation: spamd (`systemctl enable spamassassin`) (see below for details) Hi all - I'm having an issue where SpamAssassin appears not to be tagging emails it identifies as spam. It has no problem recognizing and setting

Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

On 26.09.16 10:21, Maik Linnemann wrote: Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged. those mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for example between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone have a clue how to figure out whats ha

AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

mails have X_ on their external routing way. With kind of regards, Maik Linnemann Von: Maik Linnemann Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2016 13:49 An: Matus UHLAR - fantomas; users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO

AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

Thank you very much. That works. Von: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [uh...@fantomas.sk] Gesendet: Montag, 19. September 2016 12:26 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended... >On

Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote: SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like: spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient} Please note the 'max-size' parameter f

AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

o:dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu] Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 18:18 An: Maik Linnemann Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended... What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc? Is it reporting any errors? Please not

Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

Am 16.09.2016 um 19:27 schrieb Joe Quinn: On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: ... in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA may depend

Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: ... in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA may depend on the amount of ham which can be also mit

Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

Am 16.09.2016 um 18:17 schrieb David B Funk: What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc? Is it reporting any errors? Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc: -s max_size, --max-size=max_size Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any bigger than

Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

ging should already be done (and mostly its the case!) Von: li...@rhsoft.net [li...@rhsoft.net] Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 15:52 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appende

AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended... Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann: > So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one > exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a >

Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann: So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent tagged by spamassassin how is SA integrat

X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

Dear List, i have an issue with spamassassin under debian wheezy (7.11) and spamassassin version 3.3.2. my surrounding is as follows: perimeter smtp relay1 is postfix 2.9.6-2 on debian wheezy 7.11 (dedicated host) that transfers mails to relay2 which is postfix 2.9.6-2 on debian wheezy 7.11 (d

Re: Spam tagging not happening

Hi Dominic and Users, I was not using the split configuration of exim4, I'm using the monolithic config at /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template. So I added this line to my /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template config file right at the top "local_scan_path = /usr/lib/exim4/local_scan/sa-exim.so" restarted exim4

Re: Spam tagging not happening

Surely I'm missing something here and when I do a "grep sa-exim /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated", the output is null. Does this mean I don't have sa-exim configured properly? It means that it isn't being used by exim. We're veering away from SA-Users topics, but: if you dpkg-reconfigure

Re: Spam tagging not happening

Dominic, Ok it seems like SAEximDebug is set to 1, but I don't see anything similar like in your example log My /var/log/exim4/mainlog : 2010-10-19 08:13:50 1P85Q4-0003iH-Gw <= p...@decordeli.com H= wblv-ip-mesg-2-3.saix.net [196.25.240.101] P=esmtp S=26973403 id= c865a021-d0c2-4859-a538-ae67b56

Re: Spam tagging not happening

On 18/10/10 16:11, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Dominic, I just checked and the SApermreject is set sensible for now. The latter part of your email refers to SA-Flagged messages, how do I make sure this is working, as I have enabled rewrite_header in /etc/spamassassin/

Re: Spam tagging not happening

Thanks for the quick reply Dominic, I just checked and the SApermreject is set sensible for now. The latter part of your email refers to SA-Flagged messages, how do I make sure this is working, as I have enabled rewrite_header in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf. How do I add a messa

Re: Spam tagging not happening

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote: Thanks for your reply John, I'm really new to Exim and Spamassassin, there is no procmail scripts and I don't know how to glue SA onto Exim? Can you help me with that? I'm not an Exim guru, sorry. When I look at the rejected emails in the rejec

Re: Spam tagging not happening

On 18/10/10 15:22, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote: When I look at the rejected emails in the rejected logs for Exim it looks like this: F From: > Received-SPF: none X-SPF-Guess: neutral X-Spam-Score: 23.9 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam det

Re: Spam tagging not happening

Thanks for your reply John, I'm really new to Exim and Spamassassin, there is no procmail scripts and I don't know how to glue SA onto Exim? Can you help me with that? When I look at the rejected emails in the rejected logs for Exim it looks like this: F From: Received-SPF: none X-SPF-Gues

Re: Spam tagging not happening

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Jeremy Van Rooyen wrote: Hi all, I need help with my spamassasin configuration. Setup is as follows: Ubuntu (OS), Exim4 (MTA), Spamassasin (Spam Filter). When I look at my logs I can see messages been identified as spam, but it does not get tagged on the email client side.

Spam tagging not happening

Hi all, I need help with my spamassasin configuration. Setup is as follows: Ubuntu (OS), Exim4 (MTA), Spamassasin (Spam Filter). When I look at my logs I can see messages been identified as spam, but it does not get tagged on the email client side. I did look at some forums and I also made the ne

Re: Spam Tagging on two systems

s used > for spam tagging. Now we have the problem, that the customers mail relay > is deleting or overwriting or spam tagging. > > How is it possible to set up the customers spamassassin, that it uses > our Spamtagging for spam classification? > If he wants his own rules to deal

Re: Spam Tagging on two systems

Sebastian Ganschow wrote: > How is it possible to set up the customers spamassassin, that it uses > our Spamtagging for spam classification? You could just disable all the Spamassassin-supplied rules and write your own simple set that only looks at your classification. But, why even try to class

Spam Tagging on two systems

Hi, for one of our customers our mail relays are the responsible Mail-Server. Our servers are sending all of his mail to his own mail relay. On our mail relays as well as on his on mail relay spamassassin is used for spam tagging. Now we have the problem, that the customers mail relay is

RE: SPAM tagging

: SPAM tagging Hi i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link ) .. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ . As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our

Re: SPAM tagging

Agnello George schrieb: Hi i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link ) .. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ . As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our requirem

SPAM tagging

Hi i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link ) .. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ . As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our requirement is that it should be b

RE: inconsistant spam tagging

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 7.1 [SPAM detected True ; 9.2 / 5.0] Report For Traders ... > spamfilter_string_action=data:,require ["fileinto"]; fileinto > "SPAM";["addheader "];addtag "[SPAM detected $U]";addheader > "X-Spam-Level: $U"; An uneducated guess... Perhaps there's another addtag later on

Re: inconsistant spam tagging

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0

inconsistant spam tagging

dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online Pharm

inconsistant spam tagging

dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online Pharm

Re: spam tagging

At 09:30 AM 12/22/2004, shane mullins wrote: I have a simple tagging question. I searched around, but didn't find a solid answer. We have our mail set to be discarded at a score of 5.0, and it works great. But, we would like to have spam above 3.0 tagged, and looking at the message source, it is

Re: spam tagging

> To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:41 AM Subject: RE: spam tagging > > > >-Original Message- > >From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:3

RE: spam tagging

>-Original Message- >From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:30 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: spam tagging > > >I have a simple tagging question. I searched around, but didn't find a >solid ans

spam tagging

I have a simple tagging question. I searched around, but didn't find a solid answer. We have our mail set to be discarded at a score of 5.0, and it works great. But, we would like to have spam above 3.0 tagged, and looking at the message source, it is, along with the tests that flagged it. Woul