Thanks Chris,
Those instructions are excellent. Thanks very much. We simply had
to discard spam above 5.0. We we were getting over 5000 spam emails a
day. The volume was simply too much to handle.
Shane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: spam tagging
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:30 AM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: spam tagging
> >
> >
> >I have a simple tagging question. I searched around, but didn't find
a
> >solid answer. We have our mail set to be discarded at a score of
5.0,
> >and it works great. But, we would like to have spam above 3.0
tagged,
> >and looking at the message source, it is, along with the tests that
> >flagged it. Would it be possible to have ****SPAM**** (or something
> >similar) appended to the subject of messages with a score above 3.0,
> >but below 5.0?
>
> Why not just add the score in the subject for all. You discard the
ones
> above 5 anyway. (Something I don't recommend.)
>
> From the web and files that come with SA:
>
> "
> rewrite_header { subject | from | to } STRING
> By default, suspected spam messages will not have the Subject,
>From or
> To lines tagged to indicate spam. By setting this option, the header
will be
> tagged with STRING to indicate that a message is spam. For the From or
To
> headers, this will take the form of an RFC 2822 comment following the
> address in parantheses. For the Subject header, this will be prepended
to
> the original subject. Note that you should only use the _REQD_ and
_SCORE_
> tags when rewriting the Subject header unless report_safe is 0.
Otherwise,
> you may not be able to remove the SpamAssassin markup via the normal
> methods. Parentheses are not permitted in STRING if rewriting the From
or To
> headers. (They will be converted to square brackets.)
> "
>
> --Chris
> (OK, today I am nervous! The google logo has polar bears freezing an
'O'.
> For what possible purpose, other then evil, would they be doing
that?!"
