On 22-12-2022 01:48, Shawn Iverson wrote:
> I will not engage in furthering this conversation. Sad there seems to
> be some toxicity here.
>
Hi Shawn,
Please ignore comments from Reindl Harald, he has been banned from
several mailing lists for sending negative, abusive or outright
aggressive
I will not engage in furthering this conversation. Sad there seems to be
some toxicity here.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 7:46 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.12.22 um 01:36 schrieb Shawn Iverson:
> > I already build my own rpms
>
> so use them
>
> > This is not for my use
>
> so what's the point
I already build my own rpms. This is not for my use. Sorry if trying to
provide a helpful tid on cpan as described in the SA release was wrong.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 7:34 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.12.22 um 21:43 schrieb Shawn Iverson:
> > I agree with you on that. In my specific use
If this is on 4.0, perhaps a bug should be opened.
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Iverson
To: SA Mailing list
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:05 AM
Subject: SA build from cpan fails under certain conditions
Hello SA Users,
Just posting this in case anyone else
I agree with you on that. In my specific use case I need fallback to cpan
when rpms aren't available.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 3:32 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 21.12.22 13:05, Shawn Iverson wrote:
> >sudo cpan Mail::Spamassassin seems to only build properly on recent
> flavors
> >of rhel
On 21.12.22 13:05, Shawn Iverson wrote:
sudo cpan Mail::Spamassassin seems to only build properly on recent flavors
of rhel under very specific conditions, notably:
I recommend you NOT install spamassassin via CPAN, but from package.
perhaps the one in redhat or in EPEL
--
Matus UHLAR - fantom
Hello SA Users,
Just posting this in case anyone else runs into similar trouble...
sudo cpan Mail::Spamassassin seems to only build properly on recent flavors
of rhel under very specific conditions, notably:
You are not root
The cpan configuration is set to build specifically using local lib or
