I will not engage in furthering this conversation. Sad there seems to be some toxicity here.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 7:46 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 22.12.22 um 01:36 schrieb Shawn Iverson: > > I already build my own rpms > > so use them > > > This is not for my use > > so what's the point of using something else than you? > > either what you did is wrong or what the others asking your hekp is > wrong - if someine is asking you the asnwer is use a package - if the > anser is not accepoted send him straight to hell > > > Sorry if trying > > to provide a helpful tid on cpan as described in the SA release was > wrong. > > CPAn, PIP or wthaever stuff for whatever language is crap on a package > based system - why do you give a shit when you are able to build packages? > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 7:34 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 21.12.22 um 21:43 schrieb Shawn Iverson: > > > I agree with you on that. In my specific use case I need > > fallback to > > > cpan when rpms aren't available. > > > > if you want the latest vesion of every piece of software don't use a > > LTS > > distribution or learn how to build your own rpms > > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 3:32 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas > > <uh...@fantomas.sk <mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk> > > > <mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk <mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk>>> wrote: > > > > > > On 21.12.22 13:05, Shawn Iverson wrote: > > > >sudo cpan Mail::Spamassassin seems to only build properly on > > > recent flavors > > > >of rhel under very specific conditions, notably: > > > > > > I recommend you NOT install spamassassin via CPAN, but from > > package. > > > perhaps the one in redhat or in EPEL >
