Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > >No but here is what the headers look like: > > > >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on > > domain.com > >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.2 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, > > DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.231,HTML_

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

wrote: | wrote: | >I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA | >X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the | >previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this | >normal? | | What kind of havoc? I haven't heard of any i

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

| wrote: | >I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA | >X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the | >previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this | >normal? | | What kind of havoc? I haven't heard of any issues from the

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

wrote: I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this normal? What kind of havoc? I haven't heard of any issues from the Blackberry

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

On Thu, October 20, 2005 10:35 am, Justin Mason said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> On Thu, October 20, 2005 8:52 am, said: >> > I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA >> > X-Headers are prepended to the message and not >> > appeneded like the previous versions.

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Thu, October 20, 2005 8:52 am, said: > > All, > > > > I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA > > X-Headers are prepended to the message and not > > appeneded like the previous versions.

Re: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

On Thu, October 20, 2005 8:52 am, said: > All, > > I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA > X-Headers are prepended to the message and not > appeneded like the previous versions. This is causing havoc on my > Blackberry. Is this normal? I believe this is causing

RE: SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

wrote: > I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA > X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the > previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this > normal? It's a feature. Things like DomainKeys sign all the content below

SA 3.1 X-headers prepended instead of appended

All, I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this normal? TIA,