RE: Rules List

2004-11-11 Thread Smart,Dan
From: Anton Krall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 3:42 PM > To: 'Michele Neylon::Blacknight Solutions' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: Rules List > > Is this ok? > > /root/.cpan/build/Ma

Re: Rules List

2004-11-10 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:53:13 AM, Greg Earle wrote: > I've got Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI installed on 2.63 now. > But, since 2.63 didn't come with 3.01's rules like 25_uribl.cf, > there's nothing in my 2.63 setup to utilize SpamCopURI, as far > as I can tell. [...] > This won't work

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Kris Deugau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:23:08 -0500, "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > Snag mine from http://www.deepnet.cx/~kdeugau/spamtools/ > > Nice meta rules (BAYES_vs_SURBL) -- I like those a lot!!! Yep. I added them after a few customers reported FPs on legit mailin

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:05 PM 11/9/2004, Greg Earle wrote: I still have production servers running 2.63 - how can I add SURBL to them? Just go to CPAN and install "Mail::SpamCopURI" on those machines? (Yes, they will be migrated to 3.0.1 once my Testbed machine is working properly) I don't know if it's on CPAN or n

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread snowjack
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:23:08 -0500, "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Snag mine from http://www.deepnet.cx/~kdeugau/spamtools/ Nice meta rules (BAYES_vs_SURBL) -- I like those a lot!!! -- snowjack(a)fastmail.fm

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Kris Deugau
Greg Earle wrote: > But, since 2.63 didn't come with 3.01's rules like 25_uribl.cf, > there's nothing in my 2.63 setup to utilize SpamCopURI, as far > as I can tell. There should have been (IIRC) a file "spamcop_uri.cf" installed in /etc/mail/spamassassin by default, although it may only have one

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread snowjack
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:53:13 -0800, "Greg Earle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ergo, are there 2.63-friendly .cf files out there with SURBL/SpamCopURI > functionality in them? Here's my surbl.cf. Edit the scores at the bottom to your taste. # checks to do network lookups of URLs found within spam

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Greg Earle
On Nov 9, 2004, at 8:39 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: Yes, SURBL IS included by default with 3.0. The "copy a file" bit has only to do with the SURBL implementation for 2.6x (Mail::SpamCopURI). 3.0 comes with it, installed by default, enabled by default. However, if you don't have Net::DNS, SURBL, nor

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 10:05:08 AM, Greg Earle wrote: > I still have production servers running 2.63 - how can I add SURBL to them? > Just go to CPAN and install "Mail::SpamCopURI" on those machines? (Yes, > they will be migrated to 3.0.1 once my Testbed machine is working properly) Yes, b

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Greg Earle
Matt Kettler wrote: At 11:18 AM 11/9/2004, Greg Earle wrote: I don't believe this is the case. I just upgraded from 2.63 via CPAN on Solaris 9, and this is what I get: solaris9box:1:52 [/] # spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null |& grep -i sur solaris9box:1:53 [/] # No mention of SURBLs (or SAREs) an

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:18 AM 11/9/2004, Greg Earle wrote: I don't believe this is the case. I just upgraded from 2.63 via CPAN on Solaris 9, and this is what I get: solaris9box:1:52 [/] # spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null |& grep -i sur solaris9box:1:53 [/] # No mention of SURBLs (or SAREs) anywhere. Yes, SURBL I

Re: Rules List

2004-11-09 Thread Greg Earle
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 9:33:47 PM, Anton Krall wrote: So SURBL will work even if no .cf files are on any of the site rules or config dirs yet? How does SA know about URLs and where to check? I see some files under cpan dirs and SA that show some rules ab

RE: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Anton Krall
catching a lot of spam... -Original Message- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Domingo, 07 de Noviembre de 2004 12:14 a.m. To: Anton Krall Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rules List On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 9:33:47 PM, Anton Krall wrote: > So SURBL w

Re: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 9:33:47 PM, Anton Krall wrote: > So SURBL will work even if no .cf files are on any of the site rules or > config dirs yet? How does SA know about URLs and where to check? > I see some files under cpan dirs and SA that show some rules about SURBL so > I thought they

Re: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Loren Wilton
> So SURBL will work even if no .cf files are on any of the site rules or > config dirs yet? How does SA know about URLs and where to check? SA comes with a pile of config files as part of the normal install. You should certainly have the default SA config files installed. Whether these are the

Re: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Loren Wilton
> I just upgraded to 3.0 and using amavisd-new... I removed the old 2.6 rules Then you need to delete the pre25x, pre30 type rules. > enabled but I was wondering, since I upgraded using CPAN, should I copy the > rules on /root/.cpan/SA3.0/rules/*.cf to the site rules dir to enalble SURBL > rules?

RE: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Anton Krall
@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rules List On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 8:41:00 PM, Anton Krall wrote: > I just upgraded to 3.0 and using amavisd-new... I removed the old 2.6 > rules and left only 3.0 .. Also, seems 3.0 has builtin support for > SURBL and its enabled but I was wondering, since I

Re: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 8:41:00 PM, Anton Krall wrote: > I just upgraded to 3.0 and using amavisd-new... I removed the old 2.6 rules > and left only 3.0 .. Also, seems 3.0 has builtin support for SURBL and its > enabled but I was wondering, since I upgraded using CPAN, should I copy the > ru

RE: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Anton Krall
enalble SURBL rules? How do I go about setting this up nicely? -Original Message- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sábado, 06 de Noviembre de 2004 09:14 p.m. To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rules List > Im using 3.0.. How do I get a hold of SURBLs ?

Re: Rules List

2004-11-07 Thread Loren Wilton
> Im using 3.0.. How do I get a hold of SURBLs ? Im still getting a lot of > the vicodin and medicine spam mail :( > > 71_sare_bml_pre25x.cf > > 71_sare_redirect_pre3.0.0.cf > > 72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf > 70_sare_html_x30.cf > > 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf > > 70_sare_header_x264_x30.cf > > 99_

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Anton Krall
: Rules List On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 13:57 -0600, Anton Krall wrote: > Im using 3.0.. How do I get a hold of SURBLs ? Im still getting a lot > of the vicodin and medicine spam mail :( SURBL is a plugin. Look in your init.pre -- Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Co-lo

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! What can I use those instead of the lists Im using? Any urls for more info? Will using SURBL's sllow me to remove all the other cf and just use SURBL's ? What version SA are you using. I dont think you are using SURBL's right now. I think that will get you going a lot better then the gazillio

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Anton Krall
BTW I just upgraded to 3.0 and using rules_du_jour -Original Message- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sábado, 06 de Noviembre de 2004 12:23 p.m. To: Anton Krall Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rules List Hi! > > I am using the following

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Anton Krall
To: Anton Krall Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rules List Hi! > > I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going thru.. > Any extra rules you recommend adding? > > 70_sare_adult.cf 70_sare_header1.cf 70_sare_html3.c

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Michele Neylon::Blacknight Solutions
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 13:57 -0600, Anton Krall wrote: > Im using 3.0.. How do I get a hold of SURBLs ? Im still getting a lot of > the vicodin and medicine spam mail :( SURBL is a plugin. Look in your init.pre -- Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Co-location & Domain Registrati

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Anton Krall
URI plugin or else upgrade to Spamassassin 3.x. Also try to use dcc and razor if you are not using tht. Rakesh On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 21:41, Anton Krall wrote: > Guys. > > I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going thru.. > Any extra rules you reco

Re: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going thru.. Any extra rules you recommend adding? 70_sare_adult.cf 70_sare_header1.cf 70_sare_html3.cf 71_sare_bml_pre25x.cf 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf 70_sare_header2.cf 70_sare_html4.cf

RE: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
Get rid of bigevil immediately!! It is no longer updated and kills servers :) If you are still running the 2.6* series use spamcop uri to add support for SURBL Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd Hosting, co-location & domains http://www.blacknight.ie/ Tel. +353 59 9137101 Pro

Re: Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Rakesh
plugin or else upgrade to Spamassassin 3.x. Also try to use dcc and razor if you are not using tht. Rakesh On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 21:41, Anton Krall wrote: > Guys. > > I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going thru.. > Any extra rules you reco

Rules List

2004-11-06 Thread Anton Krall
Guys. I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going thru.. Any extra rules you recommend adding? 70_sare_adult.cf 70_sare_header1.cf 70_sare_html3.cf 71_sare_bml_pre25x.cf 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf 70_sare_header2.cf 70_sare_html4.cf