On 7/10/11 5:01 PM, Chris wrote:
SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
shows the dkim signature to be invalid. Is there a reason why that would
be? When SA is ran against it a 2nd time then I guess it's failing
verification?
guess so. you can find out why, and fix it.
or, give up and use
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 16:40 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 7/10/11 4:29 PM, Chris wrote:
> > 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
> > valid
> something is breaking your dkim signature before you get it.
> if this is INTERNAL, make sure your split zone dns has y
On 7/10/11 4:29 PM, Chris wrote:
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
valid
something is breaking your dkim signature before you get it.
if this is INTERNAL, make sure your split zone dns has your dkim dns
entries.
google for dkim test email address's.
make sur
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:24 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
> >
> > > Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
> >
> > tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
> >
> That's no
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
>
> > Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
>
> tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
>
That's normal. The HTML generated by word processors, etc is seldom
clean but every
On Tue 08 Sep 2009 06:25:49 PM CEST, Mark Martinec wrote
Sure, if you want it to be be whitelisted.
tidy give me 95 warns on the html part :)
In absence of the second parameter, whitelist_from_dkim
whitelists only on author signatures.
this makes it simple to dump address books from horde
Benny,
> > Still when it is checked by DIM, it reports "author
> > keine-antw...@community36.net, not in any dkim whitelist".
>
> correct it happends here aswell
>
> [22718] dbg: dkim: VALID third-party signature
> by id keine-antwort=3dcommunity36@mcsv129.net,
> author keine-antw...@com
On Tue 08 Sep 2009 10:04:21 AM CEST, Per Jessen wrote
Still when it is checked by DIM, it reports "author
keine-antw...@community36.net, not in any dkim whitelist".
correct it happends here aswell
[22718] dbg: dkim: performing public key lookup and signature verification
[22718] dbg: dkim: sig
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
[snip]
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.net mcsv129.net
>
Just to confirm that it works:
dkim: author keine-antw...@community36.net, WHITELISTED by
whitelist_from_dkim
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
> Without the second argument to whitelist_from_dkim, it checks for
> author signatures, as documented. In your case the mail carries a
> signature by domain mcsv129.net, so you have a third-party signature
> there.
>
> If you want to whitelist an author by some thi
Per,
> >> http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
> >> whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.net
> >>
> >> The actual author is 'keine-antw...@community36.net'; I have run it
> >> through SA with debug on and I see it being added to whitelist
> >> entries. Still when it is checked by DIM, it reports
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 08.09.09 10:04, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I still don't seem to be getting more friendly with
>> whitelist_from_dkim -
>>
>> could someone please try feeding this email through your SA setup:
>>
>> http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
>>
>> with this enabled:
>>
On 08.09.09 10:04, Per Jessen wrote:
> I still don't seem to be getting more friendly with
> whitelist_from_dkim -
>
> could someone please try feeding this email through your SA setup:
>
> http://jessen.ch/files/community36.eml
>
> with this enabled:
>
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@community36.n
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:01:09 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> http://jessen.ch/files/sa-lint-debug.txt
old Mail::DKIM (0.32) (0.36 latest)
and warn on netset
Mail::Domainkeys is not needed, check that you dont load it in pre files
--
Benny Pedersen
Per Jessen wrote:
> http://jessen.ch/files/belo-news-dkim-testmsg.output3
> Notice:
>
> # grep cond_clause.*DKIM /tmp/belo-news-dkim-testmsg.output3
> dbg: cond_clause_plugin_loaded: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM=1
> dbg: cond_clause_plugin_loaded: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM=1
> dbg: con
Per Jessen wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> One very suspicious line is:
>>
>> "dkim: no wl entries match author pen...@belo-news.com, no need to
>> verify sigs"
>>
>> Despite my config:
>>
>> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
>> whitelist_from_dkim *...@belo-news.com
>> endif
>
> I've
Per Jessen wrote:
> One very suspicious line is:
>
> "dkim: no wl entries match author pen...@belo-news.com, no need to
> verify sigs"
>
> Despite my config:
>
> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@belo-news.com
> endif
I've done a few more tests - AFAICT, the
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
>> The lint test-message presumably wouldn't cause DKIM_VERIFIED to hit
>> anyway, but DNS is most definitely enabled.
>
> Please send the debug output on a real signed message run, e.g.:
> spamassassin -D -t test.log 2>&1
>
Just ran a test like that -
http://
Per,
> The lint test-message presumably wouldn't cause DKIM_VERIFIED to hit
> anyway, but DNS is most definitely enabled.
Please send the debug output on a real signed message run, e.g.:
spamassassin -D -t test.log 2>&1
Mark
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
>> >> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
>> >> whitelisting doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing
>> >> wrong?
>> >
>> > this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
>>
>> Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows
Per,
> >> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
> >> whitelisting
> >> doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
>
> Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows no problems.
>
> > output from spa
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> I see DKIM_VERIFIED hit in mails from example.com, but the
>> whitelisting
>> doesn't happen for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
>
> this should not happend, check spamassassin --lint
Yep, I always do before loading a new ruleset, shows no problems.
> output from s
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:41:51 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> My ruleset contains lines like this:
>
> ifplugin Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::DKIM
> whitelist_from_dkim *...@example.com
> endif
i would use def_whitelist_from_dkim with wildcard user, just me, but imho
better
in other words:
whitelist_f
23 matches
Mail list logo
